“The night is darkest just before the dawn. But the dawn is coming.”
— Harvey Dent (via Thomas Fuller)

🎵 Song of the Day: “Keep the Faith” — Bon Jovi — clean, driving, the anthem for holding your ground right up to the turn.

📡 THE NEWS

📊 Market Snapshot

(Live · Wednesday Evening · Motley Fool + Bitcoin.com + Babypips)

🟧 BTC: $84,500 (+2% · cracked $84K, high $84,808 — the coil fired up) 🚀
🔵 ETH: $2,493 (+2.3% · rode the move) 🚀
🌐 XRP: $1.36 (+1%)
🟣 SOL: $108 (+1.9% · Solana network upgrade launched) 🚀

The Break: BTC broke the $83.2K cap it was pinned under and ran to $84,808 on returning ETF demand + a tech-stock rally
The Squeeze: $188M in shorts liquidated, 71,000+ traders caught offside as the breakout caught bears leaning the wrong way
The Confirm Level: a daily close above $84,726 opens the path to $86,090, then September’s $87,400 high
Fed Week: FOMC Oct 27–28 · the recovery extends from last week’s $79,700 low

Support: $83,400 → $82,500 → $82,000 → $80,000 (whale bids)
Resistance: $84,726 (the confirm) → $86,090 → $87,400 (Sept high)

⚓ Three Bitcoin Stories That Defined Today

🚀 THE COIL FIRED — BTC CRACKED $84K. Per Bitcoin.com: the multi-year-tight compression we flagged this morning released upward — Bitcoin broke the $83,200 cap and ran to $84,808, its best level in a week. The move did exactly what a resolved coil does: it caught the crowd leaning the wrong way. The spring was wound tight all week, and today it fired in the bullish direction — fuel from the returned ETF bid and a risk-on tech rally. For the Faith read, this is the payoff shape: a week of quiet, uncertain grinding, whales holding the floor in the dark, and then the release. The dawn the morning brief pointed at arrived by the afternoon.

💥 $188M IN SHORTS WIPED OUT. Per Bitcoin.com: the breakout liquidated $188 million in short positions, catching 71,000+ traders offside as BTC squeezed higher. That’s the market mechanically punishing the bets againstconviction — every forced short-cover added buy pressure, accelerating the move. It’s the recurring lesson of this whole stretch: the leverage that bet against the floor holding got run over when it held and then broke up. The patient longs who held through the dark were rewarded; the shorts who doubted it got squeezed. Faith held; doubt paid the price.

🏛️ THE RAILS KEEP BUILDING — OCC + SOLANA. Per Motley Fool: beyond price, the infrastructure advanced today — the OCC moved forward with stablecoin rules and Solana launched a major network upgrade, while BlackRock’s IBIT posted a $665M inflow day Monday. The through-line: while traders fixate on the candle, the plumbing of the whole digital-asset system keeps getting built out, regulated, and funded. The price moved today; the foundation moved all week. For the endgame thesis, the rails maturing matters more than any single green candle — and today both moved the same direction: forward.

🔑 Powered By OnRamp Bitcoin

Secured by three. Controlled by you.
A $188M short squeeze is a reminder: leverage gets wrecked on the moves, held spot just rides them. OnRamp puts your Bitcoin in a 2-of-3 multisig vault across three independent regulated institutions: no leverage, no single party that can move it, no seed phrase to lose. Hold the real thing through the dark and the dawn — with no single point of failure.
Get started: app.onrampbitcoin.com
Not financial advice. Just Bitcoin custody with no single point of failure. 🔑

🌅 THE WEDNESDAY THOUGHT — FAITH (PM EDITION)

The Dawn Rewards The Ones Who Held

This morning the brief said: sing before the dawn — hold your conviction in the dark, before the proof arrives. By this afternoon, the dawn came. Bitcoin broke out, the shorts got squeezed, the green returned. And the people positioned to benefit weren’t the ones who waited for confirmation — they were the ones who held through the quiet, uncertain week before there was any proof. The dawn, as it always does, rewarded the ones who’d already been holding when it was still dark.

That’s the deepest and most practical truth about faith: it has to be exercised before the vindication, or it isn’t faith at all — it’s just hindsight. By the time the breakout is obvious, the opportunity to have held through the doubt is already gone; the shorts who “saw the light” only after $84K cracked were too late, and got run over. The reward doesn’t go to whoever recognizes the dawn once it’s bright — everyone can do that. It goes to whoever kept the faith while it was still dark and uncertain and easier to quit. The holding is the hard part; the dawn is just the payment.

Whatever you held conviction on through a dark stretch and were tempted to abandon right before it turned — this is the reminder that the dark stretch was the test, and holding through it was the win. The dawn is just confirmation of a decision you already made.

🌅 The dawn rewards those who held before it, not those who see it after.
🪤 By the time it’s obvious, the opportunity to have held is gone.
⚓ The holding through the dark is the win — the dawn just pays it out.

The coil fired, the faithful got the dawn. Keep holding through your dark stretches — the ones who do are the ones the dawn was always coming for. ⚓

🎯 Your Move

One question: Looking back at something that finally “turned” for you — did the reward go to you because you held through the dark, or did you nearly quit right before the dawn? And what is that pattern telling you about the dark stretch you’re in now?

One challenge tonight: Name the thing you’re currently holding conviction on in the dark, and recommit to it tonight — before any proof — remembering that today Bitcoin just paid out the people who held through its dark week. The dawn comes for the ones still holding when it breaks. Be one of them.

Stack sats. Stack self-awareness. Both compound.
— The Inspirator

WATCH THIS!

It’s your Daily Crypto News for Wednesday, October 21st, 2026. My name is Matt.

First, I want to thank Isaac for writing in on Spotify and thanking me for pumping Bitcoin back above $83,000. You’re welcome, Isaac. That’s what I do. Brian Armstrong, Vitalik Buterin, Michael Saylor, Elon Musk, sit down. You’re all puppets on a string, and apparently I control the entire cryptocurrency market.

Obviously, that’s a joke. Please don’t trade based on my imaginary market-moving superpowers.

But Bitcoin is moving higher, and we have some interesting developments today. JPMorgan is forecasting Bitcoin returns over the next decade, Solana has a major network upgrade, and institutional adoption continues expanding.

First, let’s bring in Craig Cobb to explain what he’s seeing in the charts.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Craig Cobb: Bitcoin’s Weekly Chart Is Looking Interesting

Craig Cobb is back with his latest market analysis, and he’s seeing some encouraging developments on Bitcoin’s higher timeframes.

Before we get into his analysis, you can follow Craig through his two resources:

• Market Intern: Try Craig’s trading education platform free for seven days.

• The Grow Me Co.: Subscribe to Craig’s free Tuesday newsletter for his latest market analysis and trading opportunities.

Craig’s Bitcoin Analysis

Craig has been watching Bitcoin consolidate for several weeks. Rather than focusing on every movement in the four-hour chart, he’s stepping back to examine the weekly and three-month timeframes.

On the weekly chart, Bitcoin established a higher low followed by a higher high. The recent pullback toward $80,000 has brought Bitcoin back into an area containing important moving averages.

Craig sees this as a potentially constructive position for the market.

If Bitcoin can establish another higher low here and move above its previous weekly high, that would strengthen the bullish trend. It could also confirm an important development on the three-month chart, where a bullish candle has formed following the previous decline.

But Craig isn’t declaring a breakout yet.

The four-hour Bitcoin chart remains messy, with overlapping price action and no particularly attractive trading structure. His message is that sometimes the best trading decision is to stay out of the market.

A bullish longer-term outlook doesn’t automatically mean there’s a good trade available today.

Craig’s Altcoin Watchlist

Craig is also beginning to identify opportunities in altcoins, particularly for spot positions based on weekly trends.

He’s looking for assets that have established higher highs and higher lows before pulling back toward previous resistance levels that could become support.

His current watchlist includes:

• AAVE

• Ethena (ENA)

• Chainlink (LINK)

• LIT

• Litecoin (LTC)

• Ondo (ONDO)

• Pendle (PENDLE)

• Solana (SOL)

• Sui (SUI)

• Bittensor (TAO)

• Zcash (ZEC)

Zcash has already started moving, while several others are approaching potentially interesting areas.

Craig is particularly interested in highly liquid assets showing established weekly uptrends. He may use daily-chart levels to identify entries rather than waiting for the weekly candle to close.

He’s also watching the broader altcoin market outside the top ten cryptocurrencies. That market has pulled back toward its moving averages and is beginning to show signs of bullish momentum.

Nothing is confirmed yet, but Craig believes the conditions are becoming worth watching.

Thanks, Craig. We’ll keep following those levels as the market develops.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

JPMorgan Predicts Bitcoin Could Return 10% Annually Over the Next Decade

Now, let’s get into our institutional news.

JPMorgan has reportedly published its first ten-year return forecast for Bitcoin, projecting approximately 10% annualized returns.

For comparison, the bank’s forecast for gold is approximately 5.5% annually.

That’s an interesting acknowledgment from one of the world’s largest financial institutions.

JPMorgan also estimates Bitcoin’s volatility around 55% and says its relationship with other assets remains too unpredictable for inclusion in its standard portfolio allocation models.

Personally, I think 10% is conservative.

I could see Bitcoin averaging 15%, possibly even 20% or more over certain periods, depending on how future market cycles develop. That’s my expectation, not a guarantee.

But what interests me is how investors might eventually use Bitcoin as an income-producing asset through planned withdrawals.

Imagine you own one Bitcoin worth $80,000. Over the next 10 or 20 years, its value could appreciate substantially, although the path certainly wouldn’t be smooth.

Instead of trying to sell at every market peak, you could model withdrawing a fixed dollar amount each year.

Maybe that’s $5,000 annually. Maybe it’s $10,000. The sustainable amount would depend on returns, volatility, taxes, and how much Bitcoin you have.

You could model different scenarios in Excel or use AI to help calculate them.

Think about it this way: what if your Bitcoin holdings could help pay for a family vacation every year for the next twenty years?

Some families spend $20,000 on vacations. Others pack everybody into the car, share a hotel room, and get it done for $4,000.

Either way, the idea is to plan rather than randomly sell whenever you need money.

Of course, Bitcoin could fall dramatically, and a fixed withdrawal strategy could deplete your holdings. That’s why the assumptions matter.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

BlackRock’s ETF Inflows Show How Bitcoin Adoption Is Changing

JPMorgan’s forecast comes just after another significant institutional development.

On Monday, BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF reportedly attracted approximately $665 million, contributing to nearly $500 million in total net inflows across U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs.

That’s a substantial amount of money moving into Bitcoin investment products.

And here’s something I think people overlook.

Bitcoin is still approximately 30% below its previous all-time high, according to the market comparison we’re discussing, yet institutional adoption continues advancing.

Price and adoption don’t necessarily move together.

We’ve watched something similar happen with gold. As investment products became more accessible and gold became integrated into portfolios, institutional demand developed over time.

I think Bitcoin could follow a comparable path.

Rather than one enormous wave of money arriving overnight, we may see steady accumulation through ETFs, corporate treasuries, banks, retirement accounts, and other financial products.

That could eventually contribute to a more mature, less volatile Bitcoin market.

And yes, I’ve considered buying physical gold myself. Every time I think about it, the price seems to take off before I actually buy anything.

Apparently, I’m excellent at predicting opportunities and terrible at acting on them.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Could Tesla and SpaceX Combine More Than 30,000 Bitcoin?

Another interesting corporate story involves speculation about a potential Tesla and SpaceX merger.

The companies have reportedly explored the possibility through independent committees, although no merger agreement has been announced.

If such a combination happened, the resulting business could control more than 30,000 Bitcoin through the companies’ existing holdings.

But I’m more interested in what a merger might mean for the companies’ valuations.

Would Tesla shares benefit? Would combining the businesses create efficiencies, or would investors view the deal as unnecessarily complicated?

I haven’t worked through the numbers yet.

I also have some regrets about not investing when SpaceX became available to public-market investors. I thought there might be an opportunity, but I’ve become much more conservative after taking some financial punches over the years.

Sometimes you recognize a potential opportunity and still don’t pull the trigger.

Cry for me, Argentina.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

The GENIUS Act Reaches Its Next Regulatory Milestone

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency has reportedly issued its final rule implementing its portion of the GENIUS Act, becoming one of the first major federal regulators to complete its stablecoin rulemaking under the legislation.

The law establishes a federal framework for payment stablecoins, including requirements involving reserves, liquid backing assets, audits, and regulatory supervision.

This is another step toward integrating stablecoins into the traditional financial system.

We’ve spent years debating whether cryptocurrency needs regulatory clarity. Now we’re watching the details of that framework being implemented.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Eight Private Keys Cracked in Under a Second, but Cryptography Didn’t Fail

Here’s a security headline that sounds absolutely terrifying.

Researchers reportedly recovered eight private cryptographic keys associated with the Indian certificate authority eMudhra in less than one second.

But this wasn’t quantum computing breaking encryption, and it wasn’t AI discovering some revolutionary mathematical shortcut.

The problem was reportedly extremely weak private-key generation.

The keys were derived from values so predictable that researchers could recover them almost immediately.

Think of it like installing the strongest vault door in the world and setting the combination to 1-2-3-4.

The vault isn’t necessarily defective. Your security practices are.

This is an important distinction because we’ve been discussing quantum computing and cryptographic vulnerabilities for weeks.

Modern cryptography can be mathematically sound while the systems implementing it remain vulnerable to poor security decisions.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Solana’s Alpenglow Upgrade Targets 150-Millisecond Finality

One of today’s biggest blockchain technology stories is Solana’s Alpenglow upgrade, which is reportedly scheduled to activate today.

The upgrade aims to dramatically reduce transaction finality from approximately six seconds to 150 milliseconds.

That’s roughly a fortyfold improvement.

For blockchain infrastructure, finality matters because it determines how quickly a transaction can be considered settled.

If Solana achieves those performance improvements reliably, it could strengthen the network’s position in applications requiring extremely fast settlement.

That’s a significant engineering objective, although we’ll need to see how the upgrade performs in practice.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Crypto Prices

We’re seeing a solid recovery across much of the cryptocurrency market.

• Bitcoin: $83,360, up 2.2%

• Ethereum: $2,461, up 3.2%

• BNB: $745, up 2.4%

• XRP: $1.35, up 4.4%

• Solana: $106, up 2.4%

• TRON: $0.33, down 0.4%

• Zcash: $1,283, up 12.7%

• Hyperliquid: $81.21, up 4%

• Litecoin: $61.52

• Total market cap: $2.79 trillion, up 2.5%

• Fear & Greed Index: 53, Neutral

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

My Take

I think today’s news shows how Bitcoin is gradually transitioning from a speculative asset into something that major financial institutions are beginning to incorporate into long-term investment planning.

JPMorgan forecasting ten-year returns is significant. BlackRock bringing in hundreds of millions of dollars through its ETF is significant. And Craig’s analysis suggests Bitcoin may be developing a constructive setup on its higher timeframes.

But none of that means we’re guaranteed another immediate rally.

We’re still watching whether Bitcoin can establish a higher low around $80,000 and eventually break above its previous weekly high.

I also think investors should spend more time thinking about how they intend to use their cryptocurrency holdings.

Are you accumulating indefinitely? Planning to sell during major market cycles? Hoping to supplement retirement income? Or simply trying to build long-term wealth?

Those questions matter more than whether Bitcoin moves up or down $2,000 tomorrow.

And for those following Craig’s analysis, check out Market Intern and his free newsletter at The Grow Me Co..

Thanks again to Isaac and everybody leaving comments on Spotify. Apparently, I’ll continue moving the markets for you.

I’ll talk to you tomorrow.

Happy HODLing

“Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful.”
— Warren Buffett

🎵 Song of the Day: “Patience” — Guns N’ Roses — clean, steady, built entirely on the reward of waiting it out — a fitting close to a patient-money day.

📡 THE NEWS

📊 Market Snapshot

(Live · Tuesday Evening · Coinbase + CryptoNews + crypto.news)

🟧 BTC: $82,000 (recovered off the low-$81Ks, capped under $82,270) 🟢
🔵 ETH: $2,390 (holding $2,380s)
🌐 XRP: $1.30 (steady)
🟣 SOL: $101 (holding $100)

The Floor Bid: whales are crowding $80K with buy orders — large holders stacking demand right at the key support
The Cap: weak ETF demand kept BTC under $82,138–$82,270 resistance; third narrow daily range in a row
The Box: $79,800 (Oct low) ↔ $84,146 — coiling tighter into the Fed; a 4h close over $82,270 refocuses on $83,500+
Fed Week: FOMC Oct 27–28 · Oct 30 monthly options expiry looms

Support: $81,539 (Fib) → $80,500 → $80,000 (whale bids) → $79,800 (Oct low)
Resistance: $82,270 → $83,500–$84,146 → $86,600

⚓ Three Bitcoin Stories That Defined Today

🐋 WHALES ARE CROWDING THE $80K FLOOR. Per CryptoNews: on-chain order data shows large-holder (”whale”) buy orders clustering right at the $80,000 level — the biggest players stacking bids exactly where the floor is. That’s the single most useful tell under a sideways tape: when the deepest-pocketed, longest-horizon money positions its demand at a specific price, it’s telling you where they see value, and where they’ll defend. The whales aren’t chasing the highs; they’re building a wall at the lows. It’s the Buffett instinct in on-chain form — greedy near the fear, bids laid where everyone else is nervous. That cluster is why $80K keeps holding.

🧷 THE BOX COILS TIGHTER — THIRD NARROW DAY. Per CryptoTicker: Bitcoin printed its third straight narrow daily range, wedged between October’s $79,800 low and $84,146 high, capped under $82,270 by soft ETF demand. Compression like this doesn’t resolve on its own — it waits for a catalyst, and the catalyst is dated: the Oct 27–28 Fed and the Oct 30 expiry. A market coiling this tight on whale accumulation is a spring loading under a lid. The grind is boring by design; the release comes next week. Until then, it’s a patience game — fitting for a day whose anthem is literally “Patience.”

💤 WEAK ETF DEMAND IS THE HONEST DRAG. Per crypto.news: the thing capping the recovery is plain — ETF demand has gone soft, and without that institutional bid pushing, BTC can’t clear $82,270 to retest $84K. It’s the honest counterweight to the whale-floor story: strong hands are defending the bottom, but nobody’s driving the top right now. A defended floor with no engine is a range, not a rally — and that’s exactly what this is until the flows return. Monday’s record BlackRock inflow showed the bid can switch back on fast; watch whether it does post-Fed.

🔑 Powered By OnRamp Bitcoin

Secured by three. Controlled by you.
The whales stacking bids at $80K hold their Bitcoin with no single point of failure — and you can too. OnRamp puts your Bitcoin in a 2-of-3 multisig vault across three independent regulated institutions: no single party can move it, no seed phrase to lose. Accumulate the floor like a whale; secure it like one.
Get started: app.onrampbitcoin.com
Not financial advice. Just Bitcoin custody with no single point of failure. 🔑

🌅 THE TUESDAY THOUGHT — FINANCIAL (PM EDITION)

Build Your Wall At The Lows

While the tape ground sideways and the nervous watched the candle, the whales did something quietly telling: they stacked their buy orders at $80,000 — building a wall of demand right at the fearful lows, not chasing the exciting highs. That’s the entire Buffett instinct in one move, and it’s the discipline that separates how the richest money behaves from how everyone else does. Lay your bids where others are afraid, not where others are excited.

Most people do the exact opposite, and it’s why most people’s transfer runs the wrong way. They get greedy at the top — buying when price is ripping and everyone’s euphoric and it feels safe — and fearful at the bottom, refusing to buy when it’s cheap and scary and everyone’s bracing for worse. The whale does the reverse on purpose: positions demand into the fear, builds the wall at the lows, and lets the frightened sellers hand over coins at a discount. It isn’t about predicting the exact bottom; it’s about having your bids waiting where fear creates value, so you’re the one buying when others are the ones panicking. The floor holds because someone decided to build it.

Don’t chase the greed at the highs. Build your wall at the lows — that’s where the patient money positions, and where the real edge lives.

🐋 Lay your bids into the fear, not the excitement.
🧱 Build the wall at the lows — don’t chase the greed at the highs.
⚓ You don’t predict the bottom; you wait there with your bids.

Whales built a wall at $80K. Do the same in your own investing — position where others are afraid. That’s the patient edge. ⚓

🎯 Your Move

One question: Do you tend to get greedy at the highs (buying when it’s exciting and feels safe) and fearful at the lows(freezing when it’s cheap and scary) — the exact opposite of what the whales just did at $80K?

One challenge tonight: Decide, in advance and in calm, the price below today’s where you’d want to be a buyer — and set the intention (or the order) now, while you’re not afraid. Build your wall at the lows before the fear arrives, so when others panic, your bids are already waiting. That’s how the patient money wins.

Stack sats. Stack self-awareness. Both compound.
— The Inspirator

WATCH THIS!

It’s your Daily Crypto News for Tuesday, October 20th, 2026. My name is Matt.

I missed you yesterday. I had to get out of the house early and was tied up all day, so we didn’t have a show. But we’re back, and I appreciate everybody who continues writing in, leaving comments, and supporting Daily Crypto News.

Bitcoin is still hanging around $80,000, and honestly, that’s pretty amazing. We’re talking about Bitcoin trading above its previous all-time high of roughly $69,000 from 2021. Adjust that old high for inflation, and we’re not quite as far ahead as the nominal numbers suggest. That’s a pretty interesting reminder of what happens to the purchasing power of your dollars over time.

But we have some big developments today, including half a billion dollars flowing into Bitcoin ETFs, JPMorgan bringing its deposit token to Ethereum, and some interesting questions about where institutional cryptocurrency is heading.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Bitcoin ETF Inflows Surge as $80K Support Continues Holding

Let’s start with the biggest Bitcoin story.

U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs reportedly recorded approximately $500 million in net inflows yesterday, their strongest daily performance since November 22nd. BlackRock’s IBIT alone brought in around $665 million, although outflows from other funds reduced the overall total.

That’s a significant reversal, and I like seeing institutional money coming back into the market.

Now, we’ve been talking about Bitcoin’s support levels for weeks. Craig Cobb couldn’t join us this week because he’s off the grid, but he’ll be back next week with his technical analysis.

Here’s what I’m watching.

$80,000 remains the critical support area. If Bitcoin briefly falls to $79,000 or even $78,500, I’m still treating that as a test of the broader $80K region. It doesn’t automatically mean we’re entering some catastrophic bear market.

But we need to start moving higher.

First, I want to see Bitcoin establish $82,000 to $84,000 as support. Then we need to challenge $85,000 to $87,000, eventually breaking above $90,000.

Until we accomplish that, we’re basically going sideways.

Yes, $82,000 and $87,000 are different amounts of money. I understand how numbers work. But in terms of Bitcoin establishing a meaningful new upward trend, we haven’t accomplished much until those higher resistance levels become support.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

BlackRock Introduces Another Bitcoin ETF Product, Because Apparently Buying Bitcoin Isn’t Complicated Enough

BlackRock is reportedly pursuing another Bitcoin investment product designed to provide some downside protection while maintaining exposure to potential gains through its existing IBIT fund.

We’re moving beyond the first generation of spot Bitcoin ETFs, where you simply bought exposure to Bitcoin.

Now we’re talking about buffered products, structured exposure, defined outcomes, hedged strategies, and all kinds of financial engineering.

I don’t know what half of that means.

I mean, I understand what they’re trying to accomplish. They want to create products for different investment objectives, including investors who want to limit certain losses in exchange for giving up some upside.

But sometimes I think Wall Street just loves making things complicated.

How about you buy Bitcoin and HODL?

Apparently, that’s not enough for the financial geniuses creating new products.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

JPMorgan Brings JPM Coin to Ethereum, but Why?

This might be the most interesting institutional story of the day.

JPMorgan is reportedly expanding JPM Coin, its tokenized bank-deposit infrastructure, onto Ethereum for institutional clients.

Previously, JPMorgan’s blockchain settlement operations were primarily associated with its private Kinexys network, which reportedly processes more than $7 billion in transfers daily.

Now the bank is moving part of that infrastructure onto a public blockchain.

That’s a pretty significant development.

We’re not talking about an ordinary stablecoin issued by some outside company. We’re talking about a token representing deposits at JPMorgan, one of the largest banks in the world.

But here’s my question.

Why would JPMorgan want to use Ethereum instead of its own private blockchain?

On its own network, the bank has more control over settlement, privacy, compliance, and infrastructure. It doesn’t have to depend on a public network’s developers, validators, or governance decisions.

So what does Ethereum offer that JPMorgan doesn’t already have?

My suspicion is that this is about expanding access to a larger financial ecosystem. If JPMorgan wants its deposit tokens interacting with institutions and applications operating on Ethereum, that could create opportunities beyond its existing private network.

But it also creates complications.

Imagine JPMorgan increasingly depending on Ethereum for significant institutional financial activity. At some point, the bank is going to have serious conversations with the Ethereum Foundation, developers, and everybody involved in maintaining the network.

They’re going to want reliability, stability, and assurances that upgrades won’t interfere with institutional operations.

I think this is fascinating because it brings traditional banking closer to public blockchain infrastructure. But I remain skeptical about the business rationale, and I’d genuinely like to understand what JPMorgan expects to gain.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Strive and Strategy Buy More Bitcoin While Another Company Dumps Solana

Corporate cryptocurrency treasury strategies continue moving in different directions.

Strive reportedly purchased another 1,223 Bitcoin for approximately $100 million, bringing its total holdings to around 36,818 BTC. That follows another substantial purchase we discussed last week.

Michael Saylor’s Strategy also added approximately 267 Bitcoin for $22 million. That’s a much smaller purchase than some of its previous acquisitions, but the company continues accumulating.

Then we have Sky AI, which reportedly sold its entire Solana treasury and announced a $201 million stock buyback.

That’s interesting because we’ve spent much of this year watching public companies raise money specifically to accumulate Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, XRP, and other cryptocurrencies.

Sky AI is going in the opposite direction.

It’s effectively deciding that returning capital to shareholders through stock repurchases makes more sense than continuing to hold Solana.

And I think that’s worth watching. Not every corporate cryptocurrency treasury strategy is going to work, and companies may eventually decide their capital is better deployed elsewhere.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

The GENIUS Act Moves Into Implementation as Crypto Regulation Gets Complicated

The GENIUS Act debate is moving from passing legislation to determining how the law actually works.

The Blockchain Association has submitted a formal response to the Treasury Department’s proposed implementation rules, generally supporting the approach while requesting clearer definitions in several areas.

One concern involves decentralized finance infrastructure. The association argues that validators and developers of self-custody software shouldn’t automatically be classified as digital asset service providers.

That makes sense.

Another concern involves criminal liability. The association wants penalties for knowingly participating in unlawful stablecoin issuance to focus on people who actually know about and meaningfully assist the illegal activity, rather than ordinary secondary-market participants.

The third issue involves foreign stablecoins and how much due diligence businesses should be expected to conduct on issuers with whom they have no direct relationship.

That one’s a little more complicated, but the basic concern appears to be avoiding unreasonable compliance obligations for businesses that aren’t directly involved with a particular issuer.

Meanwhile, the CFTC and CME Group are reportedly in a dispute over crypto perpetual futures.

Perpetual futures are enormously popular internationally because, unlike traditional futures contracts, they don’t have expiration dates.

If regulated U.S. exchanges gain greater freedom to offer these products, it could significantly reshape the domestic cryptocurrency derivatives market.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Mastercard Targets Stablecoin Fraud as Zcash Prepares for Quantum Computing

Mastercard has introduced a system called Stablecoin Security, designed to evaluate stablecoin transactions for fraud, scams, sanctions exposure, and other financial crime risks before settlement.

What I find interesting is how this works when transactions are moving across public blockchains.

Traditional banks can freeze accounts, reverse certain transactions, and intervene within their own systems. Public blockchains operate differently, particularly when transactions are irreversible.

So how do you identify suspicious activity, prevent problematic transactions, and manage compliance before assets move on-chain?

That’s an important question, especially as companies like JPMorgan expand into public blockchain infrastructure.

We’re also seeing more developments around quantum security.

Zcash developers are reportedly working on changes intended to limit how much transaction history could become exposed if future quantum computers compromise certain cryptographic protections.

The proposal involves assigning individual viewing keys to swaps, potentially reducing the damage if one key becomes vulnerable.

To be clear, quantum computers cannot currently break Zcash’s cryptography in the way being discussed.

But developers are increasingly treating quantum security as an engineering problem that needs attention now, rather than something to worry about decades from today.

We’ve been talking about this with Bitcoin and Ethereum, and now we’re seeing similar conversations across other cryptocurrency networks.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Cardano’s New Programming Language and $10 Billion in Crypto Yield Vaults

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson says he’s personally developing a new programming language with Input Output Global engineer Lucas Rossa.

The proposed language would incorporate transaction intents, allowing users to specify what they want accomplished rather than every technical step required to execute it. It would also incorporate proof-carrying data and Groth16 zero-knowledge proofs.

That’s a pretty technical development, but the larger idea is making blockchain applications easier to express and verify.

Separately, cryptocurrency lending and yield vaults reportedly now hold more than $10 billion.

That figure refers to the broader crypto lending and yield-vault market, not specifically Cardano.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Crypto Prices

We’re seeing a relatively quiet morning across most major cryptocurrencies.

• Bitcoin: $81,449, down 0.8%

• Ethereum: $2,383, down 1.2%

• BNB: $727, up 0.5%

• XRP: $1.29, down 0.4%

• Solana: $104, down 0.2%

• TRON: $0.331, up 0.3%

• Hyperliquid: $78.31, down 0.8%

• Zcash: $1,150, up 1.5%

• Total market cap: $2.72 trillion, down 1%

• Fear & Greed Index: 48, Neutral

Zcash continues recovering after falling toward $1,000 last week, while Bitcoin remains firmly in that broader $80K trading region.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

My Take

What interests me about today’s news is how much traditional finance is becoming intertwined with cryptocurrency.

BlackRock is developing increasingly complicated Bitcoin investment products. JPMorgan is exploring Ethereum for institutional deposits. Corporations are buying and selling cryptocurrency as part of their treasury strategies, and regulators are trying to figure out how stablecoins and decentralized finance should operate.

This is the institutional adoption we’ve been discussing for years.

But I also think we need to ask why these companies are making certain decisions.

Does moving JPM Coin to Ethereum genuinely improve financial infrastructure, or is JPMorgan positioning itself for new revenue opportunities? Are these structured Bitcoin ETFs helping ordinary investors, or simply creating more products for Wall Street to sell?

And when companies buy hundreds of millions of dollars in cryptocurrency, what happens when their strategies change?

I’m not opposed to any of this. I think it’s exciting. But I don’t automatically assume that every development involving a major bank or financial institution is good for cryptocurrency.

For Bitcoin, my focus remains pretty simple. Hold the $80,000 region, establish higher support, and eventually break through $87,000 and $90,000.

Until then, we’re still waiting.

Let me know what you think about JPMorgan moving onto Ethereum. You can leave a comment on Spotify or email me at matt@dailycryptonews.net.

I’ll talk to you tomorrow.

Happy HODLing

“It does not matter how slowly you go as long as you do not stop.”
— Confucius

🎵 Song of the Day: “Been By Now” — Morgan Wallen — a current chart hit, steady and forward-rolling — the sound of just keeping on.

📡 THE NEWS

📊 Market Snapshot

(Live · Monday Evening · Bitcoin.com + Investing + Pintu)

🟧 BTC: $82,000 (+1% · rebounded to $83,117, settled back under $83K) 🟢
🔵 ETH: $2,405 (+0.8% · holding $2,400)
🌐 XRP: $1.31 (steady)
🟣 SOL: $102 (holding $100+)

The No-Show: the feared “Black Monday” crash never materialized — BTC rose over $2,000 off Sunday’s $80,595 low
The Stall: the bounce capped under $83K; price holds above all three daily EMAs (20/50/200) — bullish structure, tired momentum
The Drag: spot BTC ETFs logged a second straight outflow week (−$229M) — the honest caution flag
The Box: $80,567 (EMA50) support ↔ $84K–$86,600 supply zone that’s capped gains since early October

Support: $81,500 → $80,595 (Sun low) → $80,567 (EMA50) → $78,000
Resistance: $83,117 (today’s high) → $84,000 → $86,600 (supply zone)

⚓ Three Bitcoin Stories That Defined Today

🌪️ THE CRASH EVERYONE BRACED FOR DIDN’T COME. Per Bitcoin.com: social chatter about a “Black Monday” market plunge surged over the weekend — and Bitcoin did the opposite, rebounding over $2,000 off Sunday’s $80,595 low to peak above $83,000 as the feared crash failed to materialize. It’s a recurring market truth worth internalizing: the catastrophe the crowd loudly anticipates is usually the one that doesn’t arrive, precisely because everyone’s already braced and positioned for it. The loudest fear and the actual outcome pointed opposite ways again.The real risk is rarely the one with a trending hashtag.

🪫 THE RALLY STALLED UNDER $83K — ON THIN FUEL. Per Bitcoin.com: the bounce was real but tired — BTC couldn’t hold above $83,000 and settled back toward $82,000, with spot ETFs posting a second consecutive outflow week (−$229M). Price is holding above all three daily moving averages (a bullish structure) but lacks the inflow fuel to push through the $84K–$86,600 supply zone that’s capped it all month. Good structure, low fuel — the recipe for a grind, not a sprint. The near-term is less about a big move and more about whether the plod holds the floor until the buyers come back.

🧱 THE $80.5K–$84K BOX IS THE WHOLE STORY. Per Pintu: BTC is boxed between EMA50 support at $80,567 — which has held the lower wicks for days — and the $84K–$86,600 supply zone overhead. Until something breaks that box, it’s range-bound consolidation into the Oct 27–28 Fed. The market isn’t going anywhere fast; it’s just not stopping — holding its floor, grinding sideways, waiting. For a Movement-pillar evening, that’s the quiet theme: not dramatic forward leaps, just the refusal to quit the range to the downside.

🌱 Powered By Huel

Complete nutrition. Zero decisions.
Week 3 is Movement — and the hardest movement isn’t the sprint, it’s the steady plod on the days nothing exciting is happening. Huel is complete food in one step: protein, carbs, fats, 26 vitamins and minerals, no junk, no crash. Like a market grinding sideways but refusing to quit, your body is carried by steady daily fuel — not heroics. Keep moving, one clean input at a time.
New to Huel? Use referral code REF-PAULM4588 at checkout.
Not medical advice. Just complete fuel for a body built to carry the stack. 🌱

🌅 THE MONDAY THOUGHT — HEALTH · WEEK 3: MOVEMENT (PM EDITION)

Just Don’t Stop

Everyone braced for a dramatic crash today. It didn’t come. What came instead was far less cinematic: a tired bounce, a stall, a sideways grind — Bitcoin not surging, not collapsing, just not stopping. Holding its floor and plodding on. And that’s the most underrated truth about movement of any kind: most progress isn’t dramatic forward leaps. It’s just refusing to stop.

We romanticize the breakthrough — the big run, the transformation, the sprint. So when our own progress looks like Bitcoin’s today — no exciting leap, just a slow grind, a plod, a sideways stretch where nothing visible is happening — we get discouraged and we stop, mistaking “undramatic” for “not working.” But that’s exactly backwards. The dramatic days are rare and mostly out of your control; the plod is the whole game. Confucius had it exactly right: speed is irrelevant, stopping is the only real failure. The walk you take when you don’t feel like it, the rep on the boring day, the clean meal when nothing’s motivating — none of it feels like progress in the moment, and all of it is the progress. The tortoise didn’t win by being fast. He won by not stopping.

Your slow, undramatic, grinding stretch isn’t a failure of movement. As long as you don’t stop, it is the movement.

🐢 Most progress is a plod, not a leap — and the plod is what works.
🚫 Stopping is the only real failure — speed is almost irrelevant.
⚓ The boring, grinding days are the actual progress.

BTC didn’t leap today; it just didn’t stop. Do the same — keep moving on the undramatic days. That’s the whole secret. ⚓

🎯 Your Move

One question: Are you discouraged by a slow, undramatic “grind” stretch in your health — tempted to stop because nothing exciting is happening — when the plod is the progress and stopping is the only real failure?

One challenge tonight: On this unremarkable day, do the small movement thing anyway — the walk, the stretch, the rep — precisely because it’s undramatic. You’re not looking for a leap; you’re refusing to stop. That refusal, repeated, is how every real transformation actually happens. Just don’t stop.

Stack sats. Stack self-awareness. Both compound.
— The Inspirator

WATCH THIS!

Welcome to The Climb — the bull-market successor to the Cycle Clock. That watch did its job: it tracked the bear to its floor and retired on the call. Now the question flips from “where’s the bottom?” to “how’s the climb going?” — the map above us, and the guides reading the route.

🗺️ Where We Stand

Valley floor: ~$58,000 (June 2026 — the cycle bottom, confirmed)
You are here: ~$81,700 · +40% off the floor · this week: −2.4% (slipped slightly, held the ledge)
The summit: $126,198 (Oct 6 2025 ATH — ~54% overhead)

The bottom question is answered. The only one left is how the climb is going — and this week was a real foothold test. We slipped a step but didn’t fall off the face.

🪜 The Ladder Overhead

🔹 $84,000 — the “turn” level; reclaim on a daily close to go constructive · +3% · next foothold
🔹 $87,374 — October’s high (rejected 5×) · +7%
🔹 $100,000 — Std Chartered’s year-end target · +22%
🔹 $126,198 — the old summit · +54%

Clear $84K and the path to $87K reopens; below $80K, the base comes back into question. That $80K–$84K box is the whole near-term fight.

🧭 The Guides — This Week’s Report Card

The hot-CPI week graded the voices, and the pattern held: caution on timing paid; loud “all-clear” calls didn’t.

✅ Called it — the cautious-timing camp again. The week’s dip to $79,806 is exactly the near-term bite voices like Peter Brandt have warned about all along. And Glassnode + Rand Group flagged a local bottom near $80K (Oct 16) right as the floor held — early, but aging well so far.

⏳ Holding firm — the structural bulls haven’t blinked. Matt Hougan’s “10-year grind up, not a moonshot” fits this choppy week better than any euphoric call. Jordi Visserwent further Oct 17, calling Bitcoin his “most asymmetric bet ever” — a long-horizon, very-high-target conviction play. Standard Chartered’s $100K year-end still stands (reaffirmed Oct 9) — but the clock’s real: ~22% in ~11 weeks.

🔻 Looking early — Michael Saylor declared the bear market over on Oct 14… roughly 48 hours before the week’s sharpest dip to $79,806. His multi-year thesis is intact and he kept buying — but the “all-clear” timing aged awkwardly, fast.

The read: nobody turned bearish on the thesis — the split is still timing, and this week timing-caution won again. Six-plus weeks in, the voices earning trust are the ones who respect the path (Hougan’s grind framing, the floor-callers) over the ones calling the all-clear. Weight the guides who price in the pullbacks.

The Bottom Line

One week onto a tougher stretch of the climb, Bitcoin slipped ~2.4% and wicked to $79,806 — then caught the ledge, defended by spot buyers and record whale wallets, not leverage. A foothold test passed, not a fall. The near-term fight is the $80K–$84K box: hold the floor, reclaim $84K, and the route to $87K reopens. The weather ahead is heavy — the Oct 27–28 Fed and a huge Oct 30 options expiry — but Warsh already cooled hike odds to 15%. Base camp holds. We climb.

— The Inspirator ⚓

💬 Quote of the Week:
“Bitcoin held its line while the Nasdaq broke, and I respect that.”
— market analyst Ted Pillows, Oct 15, after BTC defended $80K through the equity rout

🎵 Song of the Week: “Risk It All” — Bruno Mars — a current Hot 100 hit whose title says it all for a week the market risked the $80K line and held it.

📊 Week In One Snapshot

🟧 BTC: $83,773 Mon → midweek wick $79,806 → $81,500 Sat (−~2.4% week, floor held)
🔵 ETH: $2,560 → $2,420 (−5% · led the downside)
🌐 XRP: $1.43 → $1.33
🟣 SOL: $116 → $106

The Shock: September CPI ran hot — 3.7% YoY, core 0.3% MoM (both above forecast) — reviving Fed-hike fear midweek
The Test: a global risk-off (KOSPI −8%, Nikkei −5%) dragged BTC to a wick low of $79,806 — then buyers bought it back
The Relief: Warsh gave no hike hints Friday → October-hike odds fell to 15%; the $1.47B options expiry cleared clean

⏱️ The Climb (new Sunday flagship) debuts tomorrow — the Cycle Clock’s bull-market successor.

📡 PART ONE — THE WEEK THAT WAS

⚓ The 5-Day Arc

😴 Mon — Coiled. BTC recovered to ~$83.5K, shrugging off $681M of prior ETF outflows, and coiled in a tight range waiting on CPI. The calm before.

🔀 Tue — The Decoupling. A wild round-trip — $80,850 to $84K in hours — but the story was BTC rising while tech fell; it decoupled from a chip-stock rout, and funding went negative for the first time in 3 months.

🌡️ Wed — The Hot Number. Dovish Fed hope lifted BTC toward $84K pre-CPI — then September CPI printed hot (3.7%), putting an October hike “back on the table.” BTC broke $82K; Saylor called the bear over just before the dip.

📉 Thu — The Wick. The selloff deepened into a global rout (KOSPI −8%); BTC cracked $80K to $79,806 — then buyers dragged it back above $82K, defending the 50-day line. Held the hard way.

🕊️ Fri — The Relief. Warsh walked back the hike fear (odds to 15%), the $1.47B expiry cleared without drama, and Glassnode + Rand Group flagged a potential local bottom near $80K. Whale wallets hit a record high; mining difficulty jumped ~6%.

🧠 The Quiet Signal

This was a stress test, and the floor passed it. Line up what the week threw at Bitcoin: a hotter-than-expected inflation print that revived Fed-hike fear, a synchronized global equity rout with Asian markets down 5–8%, a $1.47 billion options expiry, and oil-and-geopolitics noise on top. Any one of those is a real catalyst; all of them in the same weekis a demolition attempt. And Bitcoin’s response was to wick to $79,806 — and get bought back above $82K within hours. The $80,000 line that the whole recovery rests on took its single hardest test of the cycle and held. Look at who did the holding: it wasn’t leverage (that got flushed — hundreds of millions liquidated across the week); it was spot buyers and record-high whale wallets accumulating the fear, while the network itself got ~6% harder to attack. That’s the anatomy of a real floor — tested from every angle, defended by conviction rather than borrowed money, with the protocol strengthening underneath. The honest caveat stays: BTC’s still capped below $84K, down ~7% on the year, and the big Oct 30 expiry and Oct 27–28 Fed loom. But a floor you’ve watched survive the worst a week can throw is worth more than one that was never tested. This week, $80K earned its credibility.

🌅 PART TWO — THE WEEK AHEAD

📅 What’s Coming

🏛️ OCT 27–28 — FOMC. The big one. Warsh cooled hike odds to 15%; a hold (or dovish hold) would lift the vise that’s capped BTC all month.
🎯 OCT 30 — MONTHLY OPTIONS EXPIRY. 148,000+ contracts — far bigger than Friday’s. The month’s real derivatives event.
🗳️ US MIDTERMS LOOM (Nov 3). Election-season volatility and crypto-policy stakes enter the frame.
📊 THE LEVELS THAT DECIDE: hold $80K and the base stands; reclaim $84K on a daily close to turn constructive toward $87K.

📊 The Levels

🟢 Support: $80,000 (held all week) → $79,806 (the wick low) → $78,000 → $76,000
🔴 Resistance: $82,000 → $83,478 (midpoint) → $84,000 (the turn) → $87,000

⚓ The Bottom Line

The week tried to break $80,000 with everything it had — a hot CPI, a global rout, a billion-dollar-plus expiry, a wick to $79,806 — and the floor held, defended by spot buyers and record whale accumulation rather than leverage. That’s a stress test passed, not a victory lap: Bitcoin’s still boxed below $84K with the Fed and a huge expiry dead ahead at month-end. But you know where the ground is now, because this week found it. Hold $80K, reclaim $84K, and the path reopens. Rest up — and tomorrow, something new: The Climb debuts, the bull-market successor to the Cycle Clock, mapping where we are on the way back up. ⚓

🗝️ Powered By Bitkey

Your keys. Your coins. No single point of failure.
A week of liquidations — hundreds of millions wiped — is leverage getting punished while self-custodied spot just rides through. Bitkey is self-custody done right: a 2-of-3 setup across your phone, a hardware device, and a recovery key, so you hold your coins, no exchange to get liquidated on, no single seed to lose. Hold the real thing through the hard weeks — unlevered, unbroken.
Not financial advice. Just your keys, your coins — done safely. 🗝️

Stack sats. Stack self-awareness. Both compound.
— The Inspirator

WATCH THIS!

“Rock bottom became the solid foundation on which I rebuilt my life.”
— J.K. Rowling

🎵 Song of the Day: “Boston” — Stella Lefty — a current chart-rider, wistful and resilient — a fitting close to a week that found its footing.

📡 THE NEWS

📊 Market Snapshot

(Live · Friday Evening · Cointelegraph + 99Bitcoins + TokenPost)

🟧 BTC: $81,600 (+0.8% · held $80K all week, steadied above $81K) 🟢
🔵 ETH: $2,470 (+3.6% · led the recovery) 🚀
🌐 XRP: $1.33 (recovered)
🟣 SOL: $106 (+3%)

The Relief: Warsh gave no hint of more hikes → October-hike odds fell to 15%; Asian stocks rebounded 2%
The Expiry Cleared: $1.47B in BTC options expired (max pain $83K, put/call ~1) — low implied vol (~35%), no big move
The Bottom Call: Glassnode + Rand Group flag a potential local bottom near $80K — the floor is holding
The Week: BTC survived hot CPI + a global risk-off + a wick to $79,806 and still closed above $80K · +30% over two months

Support: $80,000 (held all week) → $79,806 (the low) → $78,000
Resistance: $82,538 → $83,000 (max pain) → $84,000 → $87,000

⚓ Three Bitcoin Stories That Defined Today

🕊️ WARSH EASED THE VISE — HIKE ODDS TO 15%. Per Cointelegraph: Fed Chair Kevin Warsh gave no indication of further rate hikes in a public discussion, and traders cut the odds of an October 25bp hike to just 15% — a sharp reversal of the fear the hot CPI sparked midweek. Pair that with a 2% rebound in Asian stocks, and the two forces that hammered Bitcoin this week both relented at once. The macro vise that squeezed the whole week loosened right at the end of it. The hot-CPI scare that put a hike “back on the table” Wednesday got walked back by Friday — and BTC steadied above $81K in response.

🎯 A $1.47B EXPIRY CLEARED WITHOUT DRAMA. Per TokenPost: $1.47 billion in Bitcoin options expired today (max pain $83K, put/call ratio ~1, implied vol a low ~35%) — and it passed quietly, no violent pin or squeeze. That matters because a feared catalyst resolving into a non-event removes an overhang: the hedging unwinds, the uncertainty clears, and the market can trade on fundamentals again. One more thing the week was braced for came and went without breaking anything. The bigger monthly expiry (Oct 30) still looms, but today’s cleared clean.

🧭 ANALYSTS CALL A LOCAL BOTTOM NEAR $80K. Per Bitcoin.com: Glassnode and Rand Group both flagged signals of a potential local bottom near $80,000 after this week’s wick to $79,806 got bought. It’s the on-chain read backing what price did: the floor the whole recovery rests on took its hardest hit of the stretch — a hot inflation print and a global rout and a $1.47B expiry — and held. A floor that survives everything thrown at it in one week is a floor with evidence behind it now. Still tentative, still needs $84K to turn fully constructive — but the week proved the line.

🛡️ Powered By Foundation

Your keys. Your Bitcoin. Your rules.
A week this turbulent is exactly when people make rushed moves — and the serious holders who rode it out hold their own keys. Foundation makes Passport, an open-source, Bitcoin-only hardware wallet: your keys live on a device only you control, and because it’s open-source, you verify the claim rather than trust it. Paired with the Envoy app, true self-custody is simple enough to actually do. Hold through the hard weeks — sovereignty, by design.
Get started: foundation.xyz
Not financial advice. Just your keys, your coins — verifiably yours. 🛡️

🌅 THE FRIDAY THOUGHT — CAREER & EDUCATION (PM EDITION)

The Hard Week Is The Teacher

This was the week that tried to break the floor. Hot CPI, a global stock rout, a wick to $79,806, a billion-dollar-plus expiry — every pressure the market had, applied at once. And $80,000 held. Here’s what you actually know now that you didn’t Monday: the floor is real, because it got tested this hard and survived. The easy weeks taught you nothing. This brutal one taught you exactly where the ground is.

That’s the most counterintuitive truth in any career: the hard stretch isn’t the interruption to your growth — it’s the curriculum. We treat the smooth weeks as the “real” progress and the brutal ones as setbacks to endure and forget. Backwards. The smooth weeks confirm what you already knew; the hard weeks teach you what you’re made of — where your real floor is, what you can survive, which supports actually hold under maximum load. You don’t learn your limits or your strengths on the easy days; you learn them on the days that test both. Rowling’s rock bottom became a foundationprecisely because hitting it showed her the solid ground was there all along. The test didn’t weaken her; it located the floor.

Whatever hard week you just came through — don’t just be relieved it’s over. Ask what it taught you. The difficult stretch was the lesson, and you passed it.

🧱 The hard week locates your floor — the easy ones never could.
📚 Difficulty is the curriculum, not the interruption.
⚓ Don’t just survive the test — extract the lesson.

$80K held because the week tested it. Let your hard week teach you where your own solid ground is. Then build on it. ⚓

🎯 Your Move

One question: The last genuinely hard week you came through — did you just feel relieved it ended, or did you actually extract what it taught you about where your real floor, limits, and strengths are?

One challenge this weekend: Take the hard stretch you just survived and treat it as a lesson, not just a storm. Write down one thing it taught you about what you can withstand or who showed up. The difficult weeks are the only ones that locate your solid ground — mine this one for its lesson before you move on.

Stack sats. Stack self-awareness. Both compound.
— The Inspirator

WATCH THIS!

It’s your Daily Crypto News for Friday, October 16th, 2026. My name is Matt.

Bitcoin is back above $82,000 after briefly testing the $79,000 range. We have some interesting institutional developments, more questions about Bitcoin security, and allegations involving Bitcoin Magazine’s business relationships.

And we’re going to talk about Tesla’s new Roadster demonstration, because holy shit, that was impressive. But I also have some serious questions about whether anybody is actually going to receive one of these cars.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Bitcoin Bounces Back, but We’re Still in the Same Trading Range

Bitcoin briefly dropped toward $79,000 before bouncing back above $82,000. It hit that lower range and bounced off it like a trampoline. Great jokes this morning, Matt.

But seriously, we’re still in the same trading channel we’ve been discussing for weeks. I’m watching $79,000 on the downside, and until Bitcoin can break above $87,000, I’m not getting particularly excited about these daily fluctuations.

Close CoinMarketCap, stop refreshing your portfolio every five minutes, and pay attention to the larger economic picture.

We’re approaching the November midterm elections, and the Federal Reserve meets October 27th and 28th. Inflation remains elevated, energy prices are a problem, and the Russia-Ukraine conflict continues creating geopolitical uncertainty.

I think the market is largely waiting for these events before deciding where it wants to go next.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Bitcoin Magazine Faces Questions About Ordinals and Editorial Independence

Paul McNeil, who writes our nightly newsletter at DailyCryptoNews.net, sent me an interesting video yesterday titled Bitcoin Magazine’s Game Exposed, Part 4, featuring HowDoNot.

The investigation raises allegations about Bitcoin Magazine’s involvement with Ordinals and whether its editorial coverage has been sufficiently separated from its business interests.

Bitcoin Magazine has an enormous presence in the Bitcoin ecosystem. It publishes news, organizes conferences, maintains industry relationships, and has business interests connected to cryptocurrency.

The allegations suggest that businesses or individuals connected to the publication have also been involved in Ordinals trading and ownership, while the publication has produced substantial coverage of those same assets.

Now, I want to be very clear. These are allegations and questions about potential conflicts of interest, not established findings of illegal conduct.

But they raise an important issue.

Corruption and unethical business practices rarely involve somebody walking into a room with a bag of money and saying, “Here’s your payment. Do this for me.”

More often, you’re looking at complicated networks of relationships, financial interests, business partnerships, and decisions that benefit people connected to one another.

That’s why these situations can be difficult to investigate.

The central questions are whether Bitcoin Magazine adequately disclosed relevant financial relationships, whether its businesses operated independently, and whether commercial interests influenced editorial decisions.

Because if a media organization is covering assets that affiliated businesses are trading or promoting, readers deserve to understand those relationships.

Is it independent journalism, advertising, or some combination of the two?

I’m not making that determination today, but I think the questions are worth examining.

You can watch the Bitcoin Magazine investigation on YouTube, and we’ll have additional discussion in today’s newsletter.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Deutsche Bank Enters Crypto Custody as Strategy Faces an Index Problem

Deutsche Bank is preparing to launch cryptocurrency custody services, initially offering Bitcoin and Ethereum custody in Germany. One of Europe’s largest banks entering this market is another significant step toward institutional adoption.

The bank reportedly plans to expand into Asian financial centers during 2027.

Meanwhile, Michael Saylor’s Strategy could face a different institutional challenge.

MSCI has reportedly approved rules that could affect companies whose primary economic activity resembles holding digital assets rather than operating a traditional business.

That potentially creates problems for companies like Strategy and Metaplanet.

Here’s why that matters.

When a company is included in a major stock-market index, funds tracking that index automatically purchase its shares. Pension funds, retirement accounts, and institutional investors often gain exposure through those index products.

If a company loses its index eligibility, those same funds may have to sell.

So this isn’t necessarily about investors suddenly deciding they don’t like Bitcoin. It’s about the mechanical buying and selling that happens when index rules change.

For companies whose valuations are closely connected to their Bitcoin holdings, that could become a meaningful source of selling pressure.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Quantum Computing Raises a Difficult Question About Satoshi’s Bitcoin

The debate over Bitcoin’s quantum security continues accelerating.

Nine cryptocurrency organizations have reportedly formed an alliance to coordinate preparations for future quantum-computing threats.

Researchers estimate that wallets containing approximately 4.6 million Bitcoin could eventually face additional risks because their public keys have been exposed. That figure includes roughly 1.1 million Bitcoin attributed to Satoshi Nakamoto.

To be clear, no quantum computer capable of breaking Bitcoin’s cryptography currently exists.

But the conversation is changing from whether quantum computing could eventually threaten Bitcoin to what we should do before that threat becomes practical.

And here’s where things get philosophically interesting.

Some researchers have discussed freezing or migrating vulnerable coins. Others argue that interfering with dormant Bitcoin would violate the network’s fundamental property-rights principles.

Imagine somebody somehow discovers the private keys controlling Satoshi’s Bitcoin.

Are those coins now theirs?

Bitcoin establishes spending authority through cryptographic keys. But legal ownership, theft, and property rights are more complicated than simply possessing a key.

If somebody obtains access to a dormant wallet, who determines whether they’re entitled to move those coins?

And if we start freezing wallets because we believe their owners are missing, who gets to make those decisions?

The whole point of Bitcoin was to remove centralized authorities from many of these financial decisions. Yet protecting the network against future attacks could force us into some uncomfortable debates about ownership.

I genuinely don’t know how the community resolves that.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

A Compromised Ledger Wallet Shows Another Crypto Security Risk

In another unusual security story, reports circulating online describe a cryptocurrency scammer losing approximately $4.9 million in Bitcoin through a compromised Ledger-style hardware wallet.

The alleged device contained hidden cellular communication hardware capable of transmitting sensitive information.

If the account is accurate, it’s an example of a supply-chain attack rather than a failure of Bitcoin’s underlying cryptography.

You don’t necessarily need to break an encryption algorithm if you can compromise the hardware that stores somebody’s private keys.

And that brings us back to the ownership conversation.

If somebody steals your Bitcoin through a malicious device, you probably want law enforcement, courts, and investigators involved. You want your property returned.

But if somebody discovers access to Satoshi’s dormant Bitcoin, would we suddenly argue that whoever controls the keys owns the coins?

That’s a pretty interesting contradiction, and I’d love to hear what you think.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Crypto Prices

We’re seeing a solid rebound across the market this morning.

• Bitcoin: $82,529, up 2%

• Ethereum: $2,475, up 5%

• BNB: $731, up 1.5%

• XRP: $1.34, up 3%

• Solana: $106, up 4%

• TRON: $0.335, up 1.3%

• Zcash: $1,235, up 12.8%

• Hyperliquid: $81.91, up 3.3%

• Total market cap: $2.78 trillion, up 2.5%

• Fear & Greed Index: 52, Neutral

Zcash is having a particularly strong recovery after approaching $1,000 yesterday.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Tesla’s New Roadster Is Incredible, but Will They Actually Deliver It?

Did you see Tesla’s Roadster demonstration yesterday?

I have to admit, the engineering was impressive.

The demonstration showed an extraordinary amount of control, including the vehicle operating upside down with aerodynamic downforce and maneuvering with thrusters. Watching the car jump over other Tesla vehicles was pretty remarkable.

And before everybody starts saying Elon Musk invented everything, fan-assisted downforce isn’t a new concept. We’ve seen extraordinary engineering involving fans that effectively suck cars toward the road before.

But combining these technologies with sophisticated computer control and propulsion systems is fascinating.

I love this kind of experimentation.

If I had Elon Musk’s money, I’d probably be doing ridiculous engineering projects too. Put thrusters on a grand piano and see whether you can make the thing hover. Why not? Sometimes you need to experiment just to find out what’s possible.

Now, I have a couple of criticisms.

First, those Roadster seats look uncomfortable. They appear to be rigid carbon-fiber structures, and unless the suspension is incredibly forgiving, I wouldn’t want to take a long drive with my back pressed against them.

But my biggest question is much more important.

Is Tesla actually going to deliver this car?

Remember, Tesla announced the next-generation Roadster years ago. People placed reservations, some reportedly paid substantial deposits, and the vehicles never arrived.

Now we’re seeing another spectacular demonstration, but what happens to the customers who already paid?

Do their deposits transfer?

Will Tesla honor earlier pricing and reservation agreements?

What about customers who earned Roadster rewards through Tesla’s referral program?

And will the production car actually have the extraordinary capabilities demonstrated?

Those are legitimate questions.

I can appreciate Elon Musk’s engineering achievements without pretending Tesla has an excellent record of meeting its Roadster delivery promises.

The demonstration was spectacular. The technology was exciting. The car looks fantastic.

But I want to see actual production vehicles delivered to customers before declaring this a success.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

My Take

Today’s stories bring us back to something we’ve been discussing all week: the relationship between technological innovation, financial incentives, and accountability.

Bitcoin Magazine raises questions about whether financial relationships influence media coverage. Strategy’s potential index problem demonstrates how traditional financial infrastructure can affect Bitcoin-related companies. Quantum computing challenges our understanding of cryptocurrency ownership, while compromised hardware reminds us that even sophisticated security systems depend on trustworthy physical devices.

And then there’s Tesla.

I love technological progress. I want people experimenting, building extraordinary machines, and pushing engineering forward. But being impressed by a demonstration doesn’t mean we should stop asking questions about delivery promises, business practices, or consumer obligations.

We should be able to celebrate innovation while demanding accountability from the people and companies responsible for it.

That’s not being anti-technology. That’s taking technology seriously.

Thanks again to everybody leaving comments on Spotify. Bobby, 303 Chiro, Obsidian Enoch, and everybody else encouraging the occasional rant, I appreciate it.

I’ll talk to you Monday.

Happy HODLing

“The bond that bends under weight and doesn’t break is the only kind worth having.”

🎵 Song of the Day: “Rescue” — Lauren Daigle — warm, steadfast, the hand that reaches in at the low.

📡 THE NEWS

📊 Market Snapshot

(Live · Thursday Evening · Bybit + Bitcoin.com + Ted Pillows)

🟧 BTC: $81,000 (dipped to $79,694, reclaimed $82K, holding low-$81Ks) 🟢
🔵 ETH: $2,445 (+1% off the lows after a brutal morning)
🌐 XRP: $1.37 (steadied)
🟣 SOL: $109 (recovered)

The Test: BTC briefly broke $80K to $79,694, then bounced back above $82K — defended the 50-day line (~$80,250) and reclaimed
The Damage: ~$1B liquidated across the two days; BTC ETFs shed $261M; F&G cooled to 53 (neutral)
The Next Gate: Warsh speaks Friday + monthly options expire — the near-term catalysts
The Read (per Ted Pillows): structure intact but “untested by a close” — wants $84K to turn constructive, cuts risk on a daily close under $80K

Support: $80,000 (defended) → $79,694 (today’s low) → $79,000 → $77,200
Resistance: $82,000 (reclaimed) → $84,000 (the turn) → $87,200

⚓ Three Bitcoin Stories That Defined Today

🛡️ $80K CRACKED — THEN BUYERS DRAGGED IT BACK. Per Bitcoin.com: Bitcoin broke below the line to an intraday low of $79,694, then staged a rapid recovery back above $82,000 within hours — defending its 50-day EMA (~$80,250) and reclaiming the level by the afternoon. The honest read: the floor didn’t hold comfortably, it held under duress — wicked below and got bought back. A support that gets briefly broken and immediately reclaimed is arguably stronger evidence than one that was never tested — it proved buyers are waiting right there. The line held the hard way, which is the only way that actually tells you anything.

🌏 A GLOBAL ROUT, NOT A BITCOIN ONE. Per KuCoin/Ted Pillows: the move was a broad risk-off — the selling “spread from inflation into the AI financing trade,” dragging equities worldwide and crypto with them. Bitcoin held its line while the Nasdaq broke, which earned a grudging “I respect that” even from cautious analysts — but it’s still moving with tech for now. The pressure came from the whole market, not from anything Bitcoin-specific — and BTC arguably weathered it better than the stocks that caused it. The decoupling isn’t clean, but the relative strength showed.

📅 WARSH + OPTIONS EXPIRY FRIDAY — THE NEXT TEST. Per Ted Pillows: the near-term catalysts stack up tomorrow — Fed’s Warsh speaks and monthly options expire — into a market that’s neutral (F&G 53) and defensive. The honest framing from the desks: structure’s intact but unproven by a close; constructive above $84K, risk-off under $80K on a daily close. Today held the line; tomorrow tests whether it sticks. The relationship between this market and its $80K floor gets one more pressure test before the week’s out.

🔑 Powered By OnRamp Bitcoin

Secured by three. Controlled by you.
Two days, ~$1B liquidated, a wick to $79,694 — leverage got punished while held spot rode it out and recovered. OnRamp puts your Bitcoin in a 2-of-3 multisig vault across three independent regulated institutions: no leverage, no single party that can move it, no seed phrase to lose. Hold the real thing through the test — with no single point of failure.
Get started: app.onrampbitcoin.com
Not financial advice. Just Bitcoin custody with no single point of failure. 🔑

🌅 THE THURSDAY THOUGHT — RELATIONSHIPS (PM EDITION)

The Bond That Bends And Holds

This morning $80,000 looked like it might break — and for a moment, it did, slipping to $79,694. Then buyers showed up and dragged it back. The line didn’t stay unbroken; it got pushed past, and then recovered. And there’s a truth about relationships hiding in that distinction: the strongest bonds aren’t the ones that never bend — they’re the ones that bend, strain, even crack a little, and come back.

We have a fantasy that a good relationship is one that never has a hard moment — no conflict, no rupture, no day it wobbles. But that’s not strength; that’s just a bond that’s never been tested, or one so rigid it’ll shatter the first real time it’s stressed. Real resilience in a relationship isn’t the absence of strain — it’s the recovery from it. The friendship that had the falling-out and repaired. The marriage that hit the hard year and came back closer. The trust that got dented and was rebuilt. Those bonds are stronger for having bent and held, because now both people have proof it can take weight and not break. A relationship that wicks to $79,694 and recovers tells you more than one that never left the comfort zone.

Don’t fear the moment a bond strains. Fear only the one that can’t come back. The bend-and-recover is how you know it’s real.

🪢 The strongest bonds bend and recover — they aren’t the unstrained ones.
🛠️ Resilience is the repair, not the absence of rupture.
⚓ A relationship that strained and came back is proven; one never tested is just untested.

$80K wicked and recovered — proof the buyers are real. The bonds in your life that bent and held are the proven ones. Trust those. ⚓

🎯 Your Move

One question: Is there a relationship you’ve quietly downgraded because it had a hard moment — a strain, a conflict, a crack — when the fact that it recovered is exactly what makes it one of your strongest?

One challenge tonight: Think of a bond that bent and came back. Instead of remembering it as “the time it almost broke,” name it for what it is: “the time it proved it could hold weight.” Then invest a little more in it — the proven ones deserve it. Bend-and-recover is the signature of the real thing.

Stack sats. Stack self-awareness. Both compound.
— The Inspirator

WATCH THIS!

It’s your Daily Crypto News for Thursday, October 15th, 2026. My name is Matt.

First, I want to thank everybody who reached out after yesterday’s podcast. Francisco Pop, Kev, Spencer, Obsidian Enoch, and everybody else who sent comments and emails. I appreciate it. Apparently, my rant about artificial intelligence, data centers, and American manufacturing resonated with quite a few people.

And Kev, I’m glad you’re another Star Trek: The Next Generation fan. Picard was practically a father figure growing up. A lot of my ideas about morality, leadership, and how society should function came from that show.

Today, I want to continue that conversation because some of you raised excellent points. But we’re also going to discuss Bitcoin falling toward $80,000, inflation accelerating, and whether the enormous AI infrastructure boom is creating serious financial risks.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

AI Data Centers: Innovation, Energy and the Right to a Quiet Neighborhood

Obsidian Enoch made a great point yesterday. Data centers, artificial intelligence, post-quantum security, Bitcoin custody, energy, and tax policy are increasingly becoming part of the same infrastructure conversation. America cannot demand innovation and economic leadership while rejecting everything required to build it.

I completely agree.

But Spencer raised an equally important concern. What about somebody who moves into a rural community because they want peace and quiet? They buy a house, enjoy their property, and then the neighboring farmer sells 100 acres to a developer. Suddenly, there’s an enormous data center humming behind their backyard.

That’s a legitimate complaint.

We can’t simply dismiss people who don’t want industrial infrastructure appearing next to their homes. I live near Cleveland’s massive I-X Center, a former military manufacturing facility that has been discussed as a potential data center location. Even though it’s a couple of miles away, I wonder whether I’d hear the equipment humming at night.

That’s something communities deserve to understand before these projects get approved.

My friend Jason, who runs the Housing Nerd YouTube channel in Columbus, has been documenting the extraordinary data center expansion in central Ohio. One project he recently covered reportedly involves temporary, tent-like structures housing enormous amounts of computing equipment, with fuel-powered generators providing electricity.

Think about that. We’re building incredibly expensive AI infrastructure faster than we can connect it to the electrical grid.

And this exposes a much larger problem.

We want data centers, but we don’t want power plants. We don’t want solar farms taking up agricultural land. We don’t want wind turbines because they’re ugly or might harm birds. We don’t want transmission lines running through communities.

At some point, we have to build something.

I care about wildlife and the environment. Those concerns matter. But we need solutions, not an endless list of reasons why nothing can be constructed.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Is AI Becoming the Biggest Financial Bubble in American History?

Here’s where this conversation becomes much more serious.

I recently wrote about the scale of the AI infrastructure boom in The Angry Democrat. The figures I discussed estimated historical infrastructure investment at approximately 1% of the economy for electrification, 1.5% for the interstate highway system, and 2.5% for railroad development.

The current AI buildout was estimated at approximately 2.8% of the economy, including data centers, chips, electricity generation, transmission infrastructure, cooling, networking, and construction.

Those estimates aren’t perfectly comparable across historical periods, but they illustrate something important: AI infrastructure investment is enormous.

And what happens if this turns out to be a bubble?

We’re talking about companies borrowing substantial amounts of money to build infrastructure that could become technologically outdated much faster than expected.

Former Ohio Congressman Jim Renacci raised an interesting question when we discussed this. Computing technology continues becoming smaller and more efficient. If those improvements continue, will we need all these enormous data centers ten years from now?

I think that’s a legitimate question.

Most people don’t need a gigantic remote computing facility for their everyday tasks. Eventually, increasingly capable AI models could run directly on phones, laptops, or personal computers. Universities, research institutions, and major corporations will still need enormous computing resources, but does the average person?

And if companies overbuild, what happens to those facilities?

Northeast Ohio already has abandoned factories, warehouses, shopping centers, and commercial properties that nobody wants to maintain or demolish. We’ve watched entire industrial facilities sit empty for decades.

I don’t want communities left holding the bag for another generation of abandoned buildings.

But my biggest concern is the financial exposure. If AI spending is supporting a substantial portion of economic growth and stock-market valuations, a major correction could affect retirement accounts, pension funds, and ordinary investors.

I’m not predicting that AI will collapse. I’m saying the consequences of overinvestment deserve serious attention.

If you’re approaching retirement, this is exactly the kind of concentration risk you should be discussing with your financial adviser. Don’t assume the stock market will continue delivering enormous returns indefinitely.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Bitcoin Drops Toward $80K as Inflation Hits 3.7%

Now, let’s get into Bitcoin, because we’re having a pretty ugly morning.

Bitcoin fell toward $80,000, with the price sitting around $80,970 when I recorded today’s show.

Inflation is the biggest immediate concern. The latest CPI figure came in at approximately 3.7% year over year, with gasoline prices reportedly increasing 7.1% during September.

That’s no bueno.

Higher energy prices are feeding inflation, and that complicates the Federal Reserve’s decisions about interest rates.

Just a few days ago, markets were pricing approximately a 78% probability of the Fed holding rates steady. Now that probability has moved much closer to a coin toss.

I think additional rate hikes are a real possibility.

The 10-year Treasury yield has eased slightly toward 5.1%, but I wouldn’t assume that decline will last.

We’re also seeing weakness in technology stocks. Nasdaq futures were down approximately 1.2% early this morning, and concerns about AI spending are beginning to affect Bitcoin.

Remember, these markets are connected. If investors start selling technology stocks and reducing exposure to risk assets, Bitcoin can get caught in that selling.

ETF flows aren’t helping either:

• October 12: Approximately $65 million in outflows

• October 13: Approximately $175 million in inflows

• October 14: Approximately $261 million in outflows

So where does Bitcoin go from here?

I’m still watching the $79,000 to $82,000 region. Bitcoin trading at $79,000 or even $78,500 doesn’t automatically mean we’ve entered a completely different market. We’re still testing the broader $80K area.

But if we lose that region decisively, I think $74,000 becomes a serious downside level to watch.

For a meaningful recovery, I want Bitcoin to reclaim $82K to $83K and establish those prices as support rather than repeatedly falling back through them.

Until then, we’re still dealing with the same frustrating market.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Institutional Crypto: Bitcoin Treasuries, Tokenization and Stablecoins

Despite the market weakness, institutional cryptocurrency adoption continues.

Another corporate Bitcoin buyer reportedly added approximately 2,822 BTC for $235 million, bringing its total holdings to around 35,595 Bitcoin.

These companies clearly aren’t approaching Bitcoin with a two-week investment horizon. They’re accumulating with the expectation that Bitcoin will remain an important financial asset over time.

And I think that’s the appropriate mindset. If you’re buying Bitcoin today because you expect to purchase a Lamborghini next month, you might want to reconsider your timeline.

We’re also seeing continued movement in tokenized financial assets. BNY and Citadel Securities are involved in efforts to bring U.S. Treasury exposure onto blockchain infrastructure, while Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin is expanding its role in brokerage settlement systems.

Standard Chartered continues projecting a $2 trillion stablecoin market by 2030.

I think that’s entirely possible.

Stablecoin issuers are becoming significant participants in the Treasury market because they hold short-term government securities as reserve assets. As stablecoin circulation expands, that relationship between cryptocurrency and traditional finance becomes increasingly important.

Meanwhile, EverNorth reportedly holds approximately 473 million XRP, worth around $648 million. The company intends to use its holdings through institutional strategies involving Ripple, Kraken, Coinbase, and BitGo, with potential expansion into lending, credit, and decentralized finance.

That’s a different approach from simply buying cryptocurrency and waiting for the price to appreciate.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

HEX Founder Richard Heart Reportedly Detained in Istanbul

Richard Heart, the controversial founder associated with HEX, PulseChain, and PulseX, has reportedly been detained in Istanbul.

Reports describe authorities seizing approximately $4 million in cash, 64 luxury watches, and electronic devices. Heart has faced allegations involving aggravated tax fraud from Finnish authorities.

These are reported allegations and enforcement developments, not a finding of guilt.

HEX reportedly fell approximately 25% following the news.

I know some listeners have been involved with HEX over the years, so this is obviously a significant development for that community.

And on a completely unrelated note, Istanbul is one of the most beautiful cities I’ve ever visited. Absolutely incredible place.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Crypto Prices

It’s a bloody morning across the cryptocurrency market.

• Bitcoin: $80,970, down approximately 3%

• Ethereum: $2,360, down 5.5%

• BNB: $720, down 2.8%

• XRP: $1.30, down 4.8%

• Solana: $102, down 4.5%

• TRON: $0.33, down 0.6%

• Hyperliquid: $79.27, down 2.8%

• Zcash: $1,095, down almost 12%

• Total market cap: $2.7 trillion, down 3.2%

• Fear & Greed Index: 49, Neutral

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

My Take

Here’s what I’m watching.

First, Bitcoin needs to defend the broader $80,000 region. If we start establishing sustained trading below that level, I become much more concerned about a move toward $74K.

Second, inflation and interest rates are creating serious pressure on risk assets. Higher borrowing costs could also become a problem for companies financing enormous AI infrastructure projects with debt.

And third, I think we need to have a much more sophisticated conversation about the AI boom.

I’m excited about artificial intelligence. I want America building the infrastructure, creating jobs, and leading technological development. But that doesn’t mean every data center makes economic sense, every community should accept one, or every company investing billions in AI will earn a reasonable return.

We can support technological progress while questioning whether we’re overbuilding, whether communities are protected, and whether investors understand the risks.

That’s the conversation I want to have.

We’re also watching upcoming retail sales, producer price inflation, and jobless claims, all of which could influence market expectations before the Fed’s October 27–28 meeting.

Thanks again to everybody who participated in yesterday’s discussion. I appreciate the feedback, including the disagreements. That’s what makes these conversations worthwhile.

I’ll talk to you tomorrow.

Happy HODLing

“Faith is not belief that the outcome will be good. It’s the strength to stand when it isn’t.”

🎵 Song of the Day: “Blackbird” — The Beatles — tender, resilient, learning to fly on a broken wing.

📡 THE NEWS

📊 Market Snapshot

(Live · Wednesday Evening · The Block + Bitcoin.com + CryptoTimes)

🟧 BTC: $81,900 (-2.3% · hot CPI → broke $82K, tapped $81,500) ⚠️
🔵 ETH: $2,440 (-3% · led the downside) ⚠️
🌐 XRP: $1.38 (-3.5%)
🟣 SOL: $111 (-3%)

The Print: September CPI +3.7% YoY (vs 3.6% exp), core +0.3% MoM (vs 0.2%) — hotter than hoped, gasoline +9.1%
The Consequence: an October Fed hike is “back on the table” (Ledn’s Wu, Sygnum) — the dovish Williams hope got overruled by the data
The Damage: ~$331M liquidated, bullish traders hit hardest; BTC cracked the $82–83K support
The Line: $81,500 is where intraday selling stabilized · $80,400 the deeper floor

Support: $81,500 (today’s low) → $80,400 → $80,000 → $78,000
Resistance: $82,000 (reclaim) → $83,000 → $84,000 (50-day SMA)

⚓ Three Bitcoin Stories That Defined Today

🌡️ CPI RAN HOT — AND THE HOPE TRADE UNWOUND. Per The Block: September inflation accelerated to 3.7% YoY with core at 0.3% MoM — both above expectations — and Bitcoin, which had firmed overnight on dovish Fed hope, reversed hard, breaking $82,000 to tap $81,500. This is the morning’s “first step before the staircase” meeting its answer: the data came in, and it wasn’t the one hope wanted. The step was taken on a crack of light; the number pulled the next stair. It’s a real setback — an October hike is back in play — and the honest Faith read is that this is exactly the kind of moment conviction is actually for.

🏛️ AN OCTOBER HIKE IS BACK ON THE TABLE. Per Sygnum Bank and Ledn’s Thomas Wu: “A hotter core at 0.3% puts an October hike back on the table after a soft jobs report.” The dovish Williams comment that lifted markets this morning got overruled by the inflation print less than 12 weeks before the Oct 27–28 Fed meeting. Higher-for-longer rates mean higher Treasury yields and a stronger dollar — the exact vise that’s capped Bitcoin all month, now tightening again. The macro headwind that briefly loosened yesterday snapped back today. The climb resumes against the Fed, not with it.

🐂 SAYLOR CALLED THE BEAR OVER — JUST BEFORE THE DIP. Per Bitcoin.com: in a notable bit of timing, Michael Saylor declared the bear market over just before today’s sell-off — a reminder that even the most committed bulls don’t control the next candle. But read it the right way for the Faith pillar: Saylor’s call was never about this week’s price; it’s a multi-year structural thesis, and he kept buying through every dip this year to back it. A hot CPI doesn’t refute a decades-long conviction — it tests the holders of it. The ones who sell on the print didn’t have the conviction; the ones who hold did.

🗝️ Powered By Bitkey

Your keys. Your coins. No single point of failure.
A $331M liquidation day is leverage getting punished — again — while self-custodied spot just rides through. Bitkey is self-custody done right: a 2-of-3 setup across your phone, a hardware device, and a recovery key, so you hold your coins, no exchange to get liquidated on, no single seed to lose. Hold the real thing, unlevered, and let a hot number be just a number.
Not financial advice. Just your keys, your coins — done safely. 🗝️

🌅 THE WEDNESDAY THOUGHT — FAITH (PM EDITION)

Faith That Only Survives Good News Isn’t Faith

This morning the market had hope — a dovish Fed voice, a step up on a crack of light. This afternoon the CPI came in hot and pulled the stair out. And here’s the honest test hiding in that reversal: the faith that evaporates the moment the news turns bad was never really faith. It was just optimism wearing faith’s clothes.

It’s easy to “believe” when the data’s cooperating — when the number comes in soft, the price is green, the outcome breaks your way. That’s not conviction; that’s just agreeing with good news. Real faith is defined entirely by what happens when the news turns against you — when the print is hot, the stair pulls out, and the reasons to quit stack up in plain sight. That’s the only moment faith actually exists, because that’s the only moment it costs something to hold. Anyone can stand when the ground is firm. Faith is what keeps you standing when it isn’t — not a belief the outcome will be good, but the strength to hold your ground when it clearly isn’t today.

The hot CPI didn’t break anything real — the 21 million, the adoption, the reasons are all exactly where they were this morning. It just tested who actually believes. Let it find you still standing.

🔥 Faith that needs good news to survive was never faith — just optimism in disguise.
🪨 Conviction is defined by the bad-news moment — that’s the only time it costs anything.
⚓ Don’t believe the outcome will be good; be strong enough to stand when it isn’t.

The number was hot; the reasons didn’t change. Let the bad day find you still standing — that’s what faith actually is.⚓

🎯 Your Move

One question: Is your conviction — in Bitcoin, in a plan, in yourself — the kind that only holds when the news is good, or the kind that can stand on a day the data comes in hot and the stair pulls out?

One challenge tonight: Take the belief that got tested today and ask the honest question: did the actual reasons change, or just the price/the news? If the reasons stand, hold — deliberately, on the hard day, because that’s the only day holding means anything. Faith that survives only good news isn’t faith. Be the one still standing.

Stack sats. Stack self-awareness. Both compound.
— The Inspirator

WATCH THIS!

Good morning, everybody.

It’s your Daily Crypto News for Wednesday, October 14th, 2026. My name is Matt.

Bitcoin is holding around $83,000, inflation remains a concern, and we’re watching the Federal Reserve. But today’s show went in a completely different direction. We started with crypto and ended up talking about AI consciousness, data centers, American manufacturing, and Star Trek. Some of the opposition to these developments is driving me crazy.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Bitcoin Holds $83K as Inflation Concerns Continue

Bitcoin remains around $83,000 as markets prepare for another inflation report. CPI is expected to come in around 3.6% year over year, largely because of higher energy prices. Brent crude is trading around $106 a barrel, and the 10-year Treasury yield is near 5.2%.

New York Fed President John Williams has indicated he doesn’t currently see a need for additional rate hikes in 2027. I’m not necessarily buying that, but markets are assigning approximately a 78% probability that the Fed holds rates steady in October.

Bitcoin ETFs are showing some improvement. After substantial outflows on October 7th and 8th, approximately $110 million flowed back in yesterday. That’s encouraging, but Bitcoin still needs to break out of the trading range we’ve been discussing for weeks.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Standard Chartered Expands Crypto Banking as France Considers a 31.4% Tax

Standard Chartered is allowing eligible wealthy clients in the United Arab Emirates to buy Bitcoin and Ethereum through their existing bank accounts. The bank handles custody and settlement, so customers don’t need a separate exchange account or external wallet. That’s a significant institutional adoption story. Bitcoin is becoming another investment available through your bank. I just hope Standard Chartered knows what it’s doing with custody, because that’s an enormous responsibility.

Meanwhile, French lawmakers are considering a proposal involving a 31.4% capital gains tax on certain crypto transactions, including Bitcoin-to-stablecoin trades. Crypto-to-crypto trades can already trigger taxes in places like the United States, so that part isn’t unusual. But 31.4%? That’s a lot.

If you invest $10,000 in Bitcoin and it grows to $20,000, you’ve made a $10,000 gain. At 31.4%, that’s $3,140 in taxes, leaving $6,860 of your profit.

I hate how we tax ordinary investors. I don’t mind taxing wealthy individuals, but I think we should consider significantly reducing or eliminating capital gains taxes below a certain net-worth threshold. Maybe that’s $1 million, maybe $3 million or $5 million. But imagine a family making $100,000 a year that turns a $5,000 investment into $75,000. That’s life-changing money, and depending on how long they held it, the gains could be taxed at ordinary income rates. I think that’s ridiculous. We should encourage people to build wealth, not punish them for taking a chance.

And don’t get me started on government waste. Are we getting our money’s worth from the taxes we pay?

In the Philippines, Coins.ph, an exchange serving more than 18 million customers, reportedly faces potential enforcement action over transactions associated with restricted offshore gambling businesses. Its operating license could be at risk.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Coinbase Wants Bitcoin to Prepare for Quantum Computing

Coinbase is calling for Bitcoin to begin preparing for post-quantum cryptography now, rather than waiting until sufficiently powerful quantum computers exist. And I completely agree.

Coinbase reportedly custodies approximately 5% of all Bitcoin in existence. Its recommendations include flexible post-quantum signatures, gradual migration, backup quantum-resistant keys, and separating the question of lost Bitcoin from immediate security upgrades.

We’ve spent a lot of time this week discussing whether AI could eventually discover mathematics that threatens existing cryptography. Quantum computing is a different threat, but the lesson is the same. These upgrades require planning and coordination. Don’t wait for an emergency.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Are We Actually Approaching the Question of AI Consciousness?

I was talking with a friend yesterday about something I find absolutely fascinating: Can artificial intelligence become conscious? We’re not talking about Isaac Asimov writing science fiction. Serious people are having serious conversations about this right now.

My friend is religious. He believes consciousness comes from God, that human beings have souls, and that machines can’t become conscious just because somebody writes sophisticated software. I understand his perspective, and I’m not saying today’s AI systems are conscious.

But imagine a child growing up with a robotic nanny. It reads bedtime stories, remembers their friends, helps with homework, and talks with them about their day. That child might see the robot as a genuine companion. What happens when somebody insists it’s nothing more than code?

We’re going to have people who say machines can never possess consciousness and others who argue that advanced AI deserves moral consideration. We’re watching the beginning of that conversation right now, and I think it’s extraordinary.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

You Can’t Demand American Manufacturing and Oppose Every New Industry

Everybody says they want manufacturing back in America. They want good-paying jobs and investment in their communities. But somebody proposes an AI data center, and suddenly everybody loses their minds. It’ll use electricity, require water, create traffic, and take up space. Well, what the hell do you think industry does?

My grandfather had a metal-stamping factory in Cleveland surrounded by houses. Machines stamped metal all day and night, and the factory supported families throughout the neighborhood. That’s what industrial communities looked like.

Now we’re talking about billion-dollar data centers employing electricians, pipefitters, ironworkers, plumbers, and other skilled tradespeople, many in good-paying union jobs. People dismiss those jobs as temporary. Of course they are. That’s how construction works.

And here’s what gets me: we’re willing to put taxpayer money into a new Browns stadium, but technology infrastructure becomes controversial because people don’t want it nearby. I understand legitimate concerns about subsidies, water, energy, and what happens if these facilities become obsolete. Northeast Ohio is full of abandoned industrial buildings. But those are reasons for responsible development policies, not reasons to oppose everything.

We can’t demand an industrial economy while rejecting the infrastructure needed to build it.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

We Grew Up Wanting Star Trek. Now We’re Fighting Against It.

I grew up watching Star Trek: The Next Generation. Captain Picard could ask the computer to do something, and it understood him. The holodeck could create an entire fictional world with characters and experiences. Nobody watching in the 1990s complained about programmers losing their jobs or the computer destroying creativity. We thought it was cool as hell.

We wanted intelligent computers, video calls, robots, and machines that could help us do extraordinary things. Now we’re beginning to build them, and suddenly people are fighting against them.

Look at SpaceX. For years, the United States relied on Russian spacecraft to carry American astronauts to the International Space Station. Then SpaceX developed an American commercial alternative. You don’t have to like Elon Musk or agree with his politics to recognize that achievement. We should evaluate technologies on their merits, not the personalities involved.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Crypto Prices

• Bitcoin: $83,380, up 0.2%

• Ethereum: $2,500, up 0.2%

• BNB: $741, up 0.5%

• XRP: $1.37, up 1.2%

• Solana: $107, up 0.9%

• TRON: $0.333, up 1.5%

• Zcash: $1,240, up 4.6%

• Hyperliquid: $81.60, down 0.5%

• Total market cap: $2.8 trillion, up 0.2%

• Fear & Greed Index: 54, Neutral

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

My Take

I’ve been thinking a lot about where I stand politically, particularly on technology. I’ve spent my life excited about the future, and I’m frustrated that so much of the conversation seems focused on stopping it. When I started podcasting about crypto in 2017, people dismissed Bitcoin and blockchain because somebody made a ridiculous meme coin. Now we’re having similar arguments about AI, robotics, autonomous vehicles, and data centers.

I don’t want to eliminate oversight, hand corporations unlimited subsidies, or ignore environmental concerns. I want us to talk about how to build these technologies responsibly, instead of simply trying to prevent them from existing. That’s why I got interested in crypto in the first place. I saw the possibility of giving ordinary people greater financial access, control, and opportunity. I think AI could be even more transformative.

I want America to help build that future, and I want ordinary people to benefit from it. Anyway, I know today’s show went off the rails a little. I’ve got more crypto news, but I’m saving it for tomorrow.

Let me know what you think on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or at matt@dailycryptonews.net. I’ll talk to you tomorrow.

Happy HODLing

“Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of intelligent effort.”
— John Ruskin

🎵 Song of the Day: “Solid” — Ashford & Simpson — warm, grounded, built on something real.

📡 THE NEWS

📊 Market Snapshot

(Live · Tuesday Evening · Yahoo + Coinbase + CoinGape)

🟧 BTC: $83,450 (+1.3% · bounced off $81,017 to $84,074, holding mid-$83Ks) 🟢
🔵 ETH: $2,519 (+0.3% · steadied)
🌐 XRP: $1.42 (recovered)
🟣 SOL: $111 (steadied)

The Tell: the rebound was spot-buyer-led — leveraged traders and ETF investors stayed away (the healthy kind)
The Decoupling Held: BTC rose while Asian equities had a “bloodbath”; BTC/KOSPI correlation ~−0.41 — a real divergence
The Macro Assist: global bond yields eased, oil slipped on Trump’s ceasefire comments — safe-haven bid helped
The Catalyst: September CPI — Thursday · the last inflation print before the Oct 28 Fed

Support: $82,000 → $81,017 (today’s low) → $80,329
Resistance: $84,074 (today’s high) → $85,000 → $87,374

⚓ Three Bitcoin Stories That Defined Today

💪 A SPOT-LED BOUNCE — THE HEALTHY KIND. Per Yahoo Finance: Bitcoin recovered from an overnight low near $81,017 back to ~$84,000, and the character of the bounce is what matters — spot buyers led it, while leveraged traders and ETF investors stayed on the sidelines. That’s the opposite of the fragile, squeeze-driven pops that collapse as fast as they come. A recovery built on people buying actual Bitcoin to hold — not on borrowed money or forced short-covering — is the kind that tends to stick. Real demand, real hands, real floor. After a week of leverage getting flushed, the market is rebuilding on a sounder footing.

🔀 THE DECOUPLING HELD A SECOND DAY. Per Bitcoin News Digest: Bitcoin rose today while Asian equities had a “bloodbath” — the KOSPI and chip stocks tumbling — and the 20-week BTC/KOSPI correlation now sits near −0.41, a genuine inverse relationship. Two sessions running, Bitcoin has caught a safe-haven bid as stocks fell, rather than falling with them. That’s the “digital gold” behavior the thesis predicts, showing up when it counts — during an equity scare, not a calm day. One data point was a curiosity; two is a pattern worth watching closely into CPI.

🕊️ YIELDS EASED, OIL SLIPPED — THE VISE LOOSENED. Per CoinGape: global bond yields fell and oil slipped (partly on Trump’s comments about a coming ceasefire), easing two of the pressures that hammered crypto last week. For the first time in a stretch, the macro helped instead of hurt. The headwind that capped Bitcoin all month briefly became a tailwind today — and it’s a reminder that the same external forces that pushed price down can reverse and lift it just as fast. CPI Thursday is the next test of whether the loosening holds.

🩸 Powered By Rythm Health

Don’t trust. Verify — your own body.
Bitcoiners live by one rule: verify, don’t trust. Rythm brings it to your health — an at-home blood test, painless, tracking 25+ biomarkers with results in about 48 hours and an app that shows your trends over time, not a once-a-year guess. Cholesterol, hormones, vitamin D, metabolic markers: real numbers, in your hands, monthly. You verify your money. Verify your body the same way.
Get 30% off your first test: rythm.health
Not medical advice — Rythm isn’t a substitute for your doctor. Just your own health data, in your own hands. 🩸

🌅 THE TUESDAY THOUGHT — FINANCIAL (PM EDITION)

Judge The Bounce By What’s Underneath

Bitcoin bounced hard today — but a bounce isn’t a bounce. The pros didn’t just celebrate the green candle; they looked underneath it and found something that mattered more than the number: this recovery was led by spot buyers, not leverage. People buying real Bitcoin to hold, not gamblers borrowing to chase. Same +3% on the screen as a squeeze would show — completely different quality underneath.

This is the financial discipline almost nobody practices: judge a result by its composition, not just its direction. Two outcomes can look identical on the surface and be opposites underneath. The promotion built on real skill versus the one built on office politics. The revenue from loyal customers versus the kind bought with unsustainable discounts. The recovery built on genuine demand versus the one built on borrowed money. They read the same on the scoreboard — and age completely differently, because what a thing is made of determines whether it lasts. The amateur asks “did it go up?” The professional asks “up on what?”

Don’t just check whether something worked. Check what it was built on — because the composition, not the headline, tells you if it’ll hold.

🔬 Judge results by composition, not just direction — same candle, different quality.
🧱 Spot-built lasts; leverage-built collapses — in markets and in life.
⚓ Ask not “did it go up?” but “up on what?”

Today’s bounce was spot-built — the kind that holds. Look underneath your wins too. What they’re made of decides if they last. ⚓

🎯 Your Move

One question: Think of a recent “win” — did you check what it was built on, or just that it happened? Was it spot-built (real, durable) or leverage-built (borrowed, fragile)?

One challenge tonight: Take one result you’re relying on — an income stream, a relationship, a position — and inspect its composition. Is it built on something real and repeatable, or on borrowed momentum that could vanish? If it’s leverage-built, start converting it to spot. What a thing is made of is what decides whether it survives the next flush. ⚓

Stack sats. Stack self-awareness. Both compound.
— The Inspirator ⚓

WATCH THIS!

It’s Monday, October 12th, 2026, and Craig Cobb is back with another cryptocurrency market update.

Bitcoin has bounced after testing $80,000, the weekly chart remains in an uptrend, and several cryptocurrencies are beginning to show signs of renewed strength.

But there’s a problem.

The market still isn’t producing the clean trends and reliable trading setups Craig wants to see.

After three consecutive weeks of gains, last week’s pullback wasn’t particularly surprising. The question now is whether Bitcoin and the broader cryptocurrency market can build on the rebound or whether we’re heading into another period of sideways consolidation.

Before we get into the charts, check out Craig’s trading education and market analysis:

Start your free 7-day trial of Market Intern:

https://marketintern.com

Subscribe to Craig Cobb’s free Tuesday newsletter:

https://www.thegrowmeco.com

Bitcoin’s Weekly Uptrend Survives the Selloff

Bitcoin finished last week down approximately 3.2%, although the decline was considerably worse earlier in the week.

At one point, Bitcoin was down roughly 7%, falling toward $80,350 before buyers stepped in and pushed prices higher.

Craig isn’t particularly concerned about the pullback itself.

The market had just experienced three consecutive positive weeks, gaining approximately 5.6%, 4%, and 2.5%.

After that kind of upward movement, a period of selling isn’t unusual.

More importantly, Bitcoin’s weekly chart continues to show an uptrend.

Craig identifies that trend through a series of higher highs and higher lows. Under his methodology, a higher low requires a particular candle structure, not simply a brief dip followed by a rebound.

And by that definition, the weekly uptrend remains intact.

Could Bitcoin fall further?

Absolutely.

Craig believes the market could pull back deeper into its moving-average zone without necessarily damaging the larger bullish structure.

The important thing is whether Bitcoin maintains its established higher low.

As long as that structure survives, the weekly trend remains constructive.

The Three-Month Bitcoin Chart Could Signal the End of the Bear Market

One of Craig’s most important observations continues to come from Bitcoin’s three-month chart.

He’s been discussing this particular candle formation for several weeks, and it remains central to his longer-term outlook.

Bitcoin produced a bullish three-month candle after a significant pullback into its moving-average cradle zone.

According to Craig’s historical research, that formation has frequently appeared near major market bottoms.

He believes the pattern raises the probability that Bitcoin has already established its bear-market low.

But there’s still an important confirmation missing.

Bitcoin needs to break above the high of that bullish three-month candle.

Craig considers that breakout a potentially significant signal that the broader market is transitioning into a sustained recovery.

The monthly chart has also improved.

Bitcoin is no longer in a confirmed monthly downtrend, but Craig isn’t calling it a monthly uptrend either.

For now, the monthly structure is neutral.

That leaves the market in an interesting position.

The longer-term charts are showing increasingly positive developments, but the shorter-term price action hasn’t provided the confirmation Craig wants.

And that’s why he’s remaining patient.

Bitcoin and Ethereum Still Need Cleaner Daily Trends

On the daily chart, Bitcoin continues to struggle with resistance.

The market has produced lower highs and lower lows in the shorter term, but Craig doesn’t consider the movement a particularly strong or orderly downtrend.

Instead, Bitcoin is behaving more like a choppy, sideways market.

It has tested resistance, pulled back, and failed to establish the consistent rhythm that makes trend trading attractive.

Craig calls that rhythm cyclicity.

He’s looking for a recognizable pattern of higher highs, higher lows, orderly pullbacks, and continuation moves.

Without that structure, there simply aren’t as many high-quality trading opportunities.

Ethereum is showing similar behavior.

After pulling back toward previous highs on the weekly chart, Ethereum is attempting to climb out of its consolidation zone.

The question is whether ETH can reclaim and hold above its moving averages or whether another leg lower is coming.

Craig isn’t making a firm prediction.

There isn’t enough evidence on the chart yet.

And when the chart doesn’t provide an answer, Craig would rather wait than manufacture a trading opportunity.

Solana, XRP, Zcash and the Rest of the Market

Looking across the major cryptocurrencies, Craig sees a mixture of promising longer-term structures and disappointing shorter-term price action.

BNB and Dogecoin: Both charts remain messy. Dogecoin looks particularly weak, with greater downside pressure and little in the way of clean trading structure. Craig also reminds traders that Dogecoin remains a meme coin, regardless of its market capitalization.

Solana: The weekly chart looks more constructive. SOL has pulled back into an attractive area within an established uptrend, creating the possibility of another higher low. However, Craig wants to see the daily chart continue moving higher before becoming more interested.

XRP: The daily chart shows a clearer downtrend, with lower highs and lower lows. There’s little evidence of a confirmed reversal yet.

TRON: The market remains choppy and sideways, offering few compelling setups.

Zcash: ZEC is showing renewed strength after pulling back toward approximately $1,100. On the weekly chart, the cryptocurrency experienced a substantial rally, retraced toward its 10-period moving average, and is now beginning to move away from that level. Craig sees some encouraging signs.

Hyperliquid: HYPE continues displaying its familiar behavior of strong rallies followed by extended consolidation. But the current chart lacks the clarity needed for a compelling trade.

Monero: XMR has remained relatively strong, benefiting from renewed interest in privacy-focused cryptocurrencies. However, Craig still doesn’t see a particularly clean setup.

The overall message is consistent.

Some cryptocurrencies are improving.

Others remain weak.

But across the market, Craig is still waiting for better technical confirmation.

Total Crypto Market Cap Holds $2.72 Trillion Support

One encouraging development is happening in the broader cryptocurrency market.

Craig had previously identified approximately $2.72 trillion as an important resistance level for total crypto market capitalization.

Following the recent pullback, the market returned to test that area.

And so far, it has held as support.

That’s a constructive development.

Previous resistance becoming support is something traders frequently watch for when evaluating whether an uptrend can continue.

But Craig wants more.

He wants total cryptocurrency market capitalization to break above its recent highs and begin establishing another leg higher.

That would suggest broader participation across the market and potentially create more attractive trading opportunities.

For now, the market has defended an important level without producing a decisive breakout.

Three Altcoins on Craig Cobb’s Watchlist

Although the broader market remains difficult to trade, Craig is watching three specific cryptocurrencies for potential setups.

Stacks (STX)

Craig is monitoring a resistance level that has already been tested several times.

The chart has also produced a higher low, creating the possibility of a breakout setup.

But the structure needs to develop further.

Craig wants to see price build toward resistance with better convergence before considering a trade.

Aerodrome Finance (AERO)

AERO is on Craig’s watchlist for a potential four-hour cradle trade.

He would prefer a slightly deeper pullback toward approximately $0.90, followed by a small bullish candle within the moving-average zone.

That would provide the kind of structured entry he looks for when trading with an established trend.

Aptos (APT)

Aptos is also developing a four-hour uptrend.

Craig is watching for an orderly sequence of higher highs and higher lows, followed by a controlled pullback and bullish continuation signal.

He’s not looking for enormous price movements or speculative breakouts.

He’s looking for clean, repeatable setups with recognizable trend structure.

Craig Cobb’s Take: Sometimes the Best Trade Is No Trade

Craig’s outlook is becoming more constructive, but he’s not ready to declare that the market has fully recovered.

Bitcoin’s weekly trend remains positive.

The three-month chart is showing a potentially important bullish formation.

Solana and Zcash have encouraging technical characteristics.

And total crypto market capitalization has held an important support level.

Those are positive developments.

But the market still needs to prove itself.

Craig wants to see Bitcoin and the broader market break through resistance and establish stronger trends on the two-hour, four-hour, and eight-hour charts.

Until then, the trading opportunities remain limited.

And that’s fine.

Trading isn’t about constantly being in a position.

It’s about waiting for the market to produce an opportunity that fits your strategy.

Craig’s approach remains focused on trading established trends, buying orderly pullbacks, and avoiding unnecessary risk when the charts are unclear.

His outlook is cautiously bullish, but his immediate trading posture is patient.

As Craig puts it:

“There’s a time to be long, there’s a time to be short, there’s a time to go fishing.”

And right now, it might be a good week to go fishing.

Of course, cryptocurrency markets can change quickly.

A breakout above resistance could bring trading opportunities back into focus almost immediately.

Until then, patience remains the priority.

For more of Craig Cobb’s technical analysis, trading education, and market commentary, visit Market Intern at

https://marketintern.com

And don’t forget to subscribe to his free Tuesday newsletter at

https://www.thegrowmeco.com

Have a wonderful week.

Happy HODLing

“Within you, there is a stillness and a sanctuary to which you can retreat at any time.”
— Hermann Hesse

🎵 Song of the Day: “Quiet” — Lights — hushed, suspended, the calm held before a release.

📡 THE NEWS

📊 Market Snapshot

(Live · Monday Evening · CoinDesk + CryptoTicker + Bitcoin.com)

🟧 BTC: $82,700 (-1.2% · tapped $84,250, faded, coiled on $82,500) ⚠️
🔵 ETH: $2,540 (gave back the morning’s outperformance)
🌐 XRP: $1.40 (steady)
🟣 SOL: $115 (easing)

The Pivot: $82,500 is the level that decides direction into CPI — hold it and $84K/$85K reopen; lose it and $80,329 (the low) is back in play
The Caution: analysts (Kibar) warn the recent breakout “lacks fuel” up here; momentum fading under $84K
The Catalyst: September CPI — Wednesday 8:30 AM ET — the last inflation print before the Oct 28 Fed decision
The Structure: still comfortably above September’s $74,913 low and the long-term moving averages — the recovery hasn’t unraveled

Support: $82,500 (the pivot) → $80,329 (the low) → $78,000
Resistance: $84,000 → $85,000 → $87,374 (recent peak)

⚓ Three Bitcoin Stories That Defined Today

🪤 THE BREAKOUT “LACKS FUEL” — FOR NOW. Per KuCoin/Finbold: Bitcoin tapped $84,250, couldn’t hold it, and faded to ~$82,700 — and analyst Aksel Kibar flagged that the recent move “lacks fuel” up at these levels, needing a strong rebound above $82,800 to avoid slipping back toward the lower range. It’s the honest near-term read: after a $1B flush and $681M of outflows, the tank for an immediate breakout is low. The market isn’t failing — it’s refueling, sitting still while it waits for a catalyst to fill the tank. That catalyst has a date: Wednesday.

⏳ $82,500 IS THE LINE THAT DECIDES CPI WEEK. Per CryptoTicker: desks are converging on one level — $82,500 is the pivot heading into Wednesday’s CPI. Hold it through the print and the path back to $84–85K reopens; lose it and October’s $80,329 low comes back into view. Everything right now is coiled around that line, waiting. The stillness is the market holding its breath before the one number that sets the tone into the Oct 28 Fed meeting.Positioning, not direction — the real move waits for the data.

🧱 THE FOUNDATION IS STILL INTACT. Per Bitcoin.com: despite the near-term tug-of-war, Bitcoin remains comfortably above September’s $74,913 low and its longer-term moving averages — the broader recovery “has yet to unravel.” The bears have a modest short-term edge, but the structural picture is unchanged: a market consolidating withinan uptrend, not breaking down out of one. Short-term chop, long-term floor intact — the coiled spring is resting on solid ground, not slipping off a ledge. Which direction it releases is Wednesday’s question.

💍 Powered By Oura

Measure the reserve you can’t feel.
Week 2 is Sleep — and a coiled, waiting market is its own quiet stress, the kind that tightens your body before your mind clocks it. CPI lands Wednesday; the clear-headed response you’ll want is built on the rest you bank tonight. Oura reads what you can’t: HRV, resting heart rate, whether the waiting is quietly taxing you. It’s on-chain data for your nervous system. The market’s coiled. Make sure you’re resting, not clenching.
See your baseline: Get your Oura Ring here.
Not medical advice. Just the data your body was already keeping. 💍

🌅 THE MONDAY THOUGHT — HEALTH · WEEK 2: SLEEP (PM EDITION)

Stillness Is Loading, Not Nothing

Bitcoin barely moved today — tapped a high, faded, then sat coiled on $82,500, waiting for Wednesday. To an impatient eye, that looks like nothing happening. But it’s the opposite: it’s a spring compressing, energy loading, the pause that precedes a move rather than the absence of one. And learning to see stillness as loading instead of nothing is one of the quiet keys to rest — and to sleep.

We’ve been trained to equate stillness with waste. If we’re not doing, we feel we’re falling behind — so we fill every quiet moment, resist every pause, treat rest as time stolen from productivity. But that’s exactly backwards, and your body knows it even when your mind won’t admit it. Sleep looks like nothing happening — you’re lying there, inert, unproductive. In reality it’s the most active repair-and-consolidation process you run all day: memories filing, tissue rebuilding, the system reloading the energy tomorrow will spend. The stillness isn’t the absence of progress. It’s where the progress is quietly manufactured, out of sight. The coiled spring isn’t idle. It’s loaded.

Tonight, when you lie still and feel like nothing’s happening — trust that everything is. Stillness is loading. Let it.

🌀 Stillness isn’t nothing — it’s energy loading for what’s next.
😴 Sleep looks inert and is your most active repair process.
⚓ Don’t resist the pause; it’s where tomorrow gets built.

BTC’s coiled, not idle. You are too, when you rest. Let the stillness load you. ⚓

🎯 Your Move

One question: Do you treat your own stillness — rest, sleep, the quiet pause — as wasted time, or as the loading phase where tomorrow’s energy and clarity actually get built?

One challenge tonight: When you lie down and the restless voice says “you should be doing something,” answer it honestly: I am — I’m loading. Let the stillness be productive on its own terms. The coiled spring looks idle and is anything but. So are you, resting. ⚓

Stack sats. Stack self-awareness. Both compound.
— The Inspirator ⚓

WATCH THIS!

Subscribe now

Subscribe now

It’s your Daily Crypto News for Monday, October 12th, 2026. My name is Matt.

And this is my sixth take this morning.

Matt didn’t sleep last night.

My brain is fuzzy, my mouth is mushy, and my eyes are blurry. I went to bed around 11, probably fell asleep around 11:30, and woke up at four o’clock in the morning. Then I spent another hour and a half scrolling through my phone instead of going back to sleep.

I had a couple of beers last night, they didn’t sit well with me, and now here we are.

So bear with me this morning because I’m not recording this again.

Before we get into the news, please leave a review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. You can also send me an email at matt@dailycryptonews.net.

And a couple of quick shout-outs.

SRT Scat left a comment saying the show has become part of their routine and helps them stay informed while they’re on the go. Thank you very much.

And underscore Caitlin sent a shout-out from Calgary, Canada, saying they’re here for the rants and insights.

Well, you’re definitely getting a rant today.

Because I spent a good portion of the weekend going down a rabbit hole about artificial intelligence, mathematics and the possibility that AI could eventually threaten the cryptography securing Bitcoin, Ethereum and much of the modern internet.

And I have to tell you, I’m taking this a lot more seriously than I was last week.

Bitcoin Holds $83K, but the Bigger Story Is AI and Cryptography

Bitcoin is holding around $83K to $84K this morning after testing $80,000 last week.

We didn’t break through $80K.

That’s good.

But I still think we’re going to test that level again, and I wouldn’t be surprised if we eventually break below it.

I don’t mean to be Mr. FUD here.

We’ve been watching this same trading channel for weeks. Bitcoin needs to break above $87K, establish something around $84K to $86K as support, and then start targeting $90K.

Until that happens, we’re still basically going sideways.

But Bitcoin’s price isn’t what I want to spend most of today discussing.

Over the weekend, I was listening to the All-In Podcast, as I usually do.

And to be perfectly honest, I’ve been tuning out a lot of their AI conversations lately.

It feels like they’ve been talking about nothing but AI for six months.

At some point, it all starts sounding repetitive.

But this weekend’s conversation was different.

David Friedberg was discussing a major collection of mathematical research released by OpenAI, and it connected directly to something we’ve been talking about here on Daily Crypto News.

Last week, we discussed Ethereum researcher Justin Drake’s warning that advances in artificial intelligence could eventually threaten the mathematics protecting cryptocurrency wallets.

At the time, I didn’t fully appreciate what was happening.

I thought a lot of the controversy was about mathematicians wanting recognition for their work and people arguing about whether AI should receive credit for solving mathematical problems.

That was part of the conversation.

But after listening to the discussion and digging into the underlying cryptography, I realized there was a much bigger question.

What happens if AI discovers new mathematics that makes supposedly impossible cryptographic problems much easier to solve?

And this isn’t just a Bitcoin problem.

This could affect Ethereum, banking, secure communications, authentication systems and enormous portions of the digital infrastructure we use every day.

OpenAI’s Mathematical Research Raises a New Security Question

On October 6th, OpenAI released a large collection of mathematical research generated by internal frontier AI models.

These are research systems beyond the models most people interact with publicly.

According to the figures discussed, the models were given approximately 4,000 open mathematical research problems.

The initial release included around 722 mathematical manuscripts, organized into 372 families of results.

The work covered subjects including number theory, algebra, geometry and theoretical computer science.

OpenAI also released machine-checkable formulations for many results using Lean, a system that allows mathematical proofs to be formally checked.

Think about that for a minute.

We’re talking about AI systems producing hundreds of mathematical research manuscripts that professional mathematicians are now evaluating.

And the models doing this work aren’t necessarily the same ones available to everybody using ChatGPT.

That opens up a completely different conversation about what frontier AI systems might already be capable of.

I’ve said before that I think artificial superintelligence could arrive much sooner than people expect. I even wonder whether some internal systems are already substantially more capable than the public realizes.

That’s speculation on my part.

But we’re sitting here arguing with ChatGPT about not using dashes while research models are producing mathematical work that has people in cryptography asking serious questions.

Now, here’s why this matters.

Modern cryptography depends on mathematical problems that are believed to be extraordinarily difficult to solve.

The security doesn’t necessarily come from the mathematics being secret.

It comes from the enormous difference between performing a calculation in one direction and reversing it.

And if AI discovers a new mathematical shortcut, some of those assumptions could change.

Why Bitcoin’s Private Keys Are So Difficult to Recover

Bitcoin and Ethereum both rely heavily on elliptic-curve cryptography.

The basic idea is relatively straightforward.

You have a private key, which is essentially a secret number.

Using that private key, your wallet can calculate a corresponding public key.

That’s easy.

But going backward is an entirely different problem.

Given a public key, calculating the private key is believed to be computationally infeasible using today’s conventional computers and known algorithms.

The underlying mathematical challenge is called the elliptic-curve discrete logarithm problem.

And for decades, mathematicians and cryptographers have studied these problems without discovering an efficient classical algorithm capable of solving them at the scale used by modern cryptocurrency systems.

That’s an important distinction.

We haven’t mathematically proven that no efficient algorithm could ever exist.

We simply haven’t found one.

And that’s where artificial intelligence enters the conversation.

AI doesn’t necessarily need to guess trillions upon trillions of private keys faster than a normal computer.

That isn’t the threat Justin Drake is describing.

The threat is that AI might discover a fundamentally better way to solve the mathematics.

Imagine that the best-known attack against a cryptographic system requires an impossibly enormous amount of computation.

Now imagine AI discovers a mathematical transformation that reduces that computational requirement by several orders of magnitude.

That’s different from building a faster computer.

You’ve changed the problem itself.

And if the improvement is significant enough, something previously considered impossible could potentially become practical.

Drake has warned that AI-driven mathematical discoveries could accelerate the timeline for these kinds of threats much faster than previously expected, potentially even into a matter of months in an extreme scenario.

Other cryptographers strongly disagree with that timeline.

And I think that’s important to acknowledge.

Nobody has demonstrated that AI can currently recover Bitcoin private keys from public keys.

Elliptic-curve cryptography has not been broken.

But the possibility of new mathematical discoveries is becoming a more serious subject of discussion.

And after spending the weekend looking into this, I understand why.

The AI Research Wasn’t Perfect

There’s another part of the OpenAI story worth discussing.

Not everything the models produced was correct.

On October 7th, OpenAI reportedly withdrew three manuscripts after a sign error invalidated part of a proof and two dependent results.

Another 14 manuscripts received corrections or repairs.

That’s important.

AI can produce sophisticated mathematical work and still make mistakes.

We shouldn’t automatically assume every generated proof is valid simply because a frontier model produced it.

But the errors don’t make the broader research meaningless.

The original release contained hundreds of manuscripts, and professional mathematicians were evaluating the results.

That’s still remarkable.

The important question isn’t whether AI is suddenly perfect at mathematics.

It’s whether AI is becoming capable of helping researchers discover things that would previously have taken substantially longer.

And if it can do that, we have to start thinking seriously about what happens when it turns its attention toward cryptography.

Three Ways AI Could Change Cryptocurrency Security

I think there are three broad possibilities.

Scenario One: Nothing catastrophic happens.

AI becomes an increasingly powerful mathematical research tool.

It helps mathematicians solve difficult problems, develops new proofs and improves existing algorithms.

But it never discovers an efficient way to break elliptic-curve cryptography.

Bitcoin and Ethereum continue using secure cryptographic systems, and the industry benefits from better research.

This is entirely possible.

Scenario Two: AI improves existing attacks without making them practical.

This is probably the more realistic concern.

Imagine that recovering a private key currently requires an absurdly enormous amount of computation.

AI discovers a mathematical improvement that makes an attack ten times faster.

Or a thousand times faster.

Or even a billion times faster.

That sounds terrifying.

But if the original problem would have required an unimaginably long period of computation, a billionfold improvement might still leave the attack completely impractical.

That’s something people need to understand.

A dramatic improvement in an algorithm does not automatically mean a cryptographic system has been broken.

The question is whether the improvement is large enough to make an actual attack feasible.

Scenario Three: AI discovers a fundamental mathematical shortcut.

This is the nightmare scenario.

Imagine an AI system discovers an efficient classical algorithm for solving the elliptic-curve discrete logarithm problem.

If that happened, an attacker might be able to derive private keys from sufficiently exposed public keys without waiting for a powerful quantum computer.

That’s the scenario that could change everything.

And not just for cryptocurrency.

We’re talking about financial institutions, government systems, secure communications and digital authentication infrastructure.

Much of modern internet security relies on cryptographic assumptions that could be affected by a breakthrough of that magnitude.

Now, would the entire internet collapse overnight?

Not necessarily.

Different systems use different cryptographic algorithms, and many could migrate to alternatives.

But the transition could be enormously disruptive.

And if a single organization discovered such a vulnerability before anybody else, the implications could be extraordinary.

Which brings me to another thought I’ve been having.

What If the Most Powerful Weapon Isn’t Controlled by a Country?

We’ve spent generations thinking about national security in terms of countries.

Russia.

China.

Iran.

The United States.

Missiles, nuclear weapons, aircraft carriers, armies and all the other things countries build to defend themselves or project power.

But what happens if the most powerful technological capability on Earth is developed by a private company?

What if a company develops an AI system capable of exploiting critical digital infrastructure on a scale that governments cannot easily counter?

I’m not saying that’s happened.

I’m not saying Sam Altman or Dario Amodei is sitting in an office somewhere controlling the world’s banking systems.

But think about the implications.

Historically, a company trying to challenge a government would face enormous financial and military limitations.

Countries have armies.

Countries have resources.

Countries have the ability to mobilize entire economies.

But if a sufficiently advanced AI system became capable of exploiting critical infrastructure, the balance of power could look very different.

Maybe the future security threat isn’t always another country.

Maybe it’s a private organization controlling technology that nobody else understands or can effectively counter.

That’s a pretty wild thought.

And it’s one of the reasons I think we need to understand what frontier AI systems are actually capable of doing.

AI and Quantum Computing Are Two Different Threats

There’s another development that makes this conversation interesting.

Researchers participating in the Elliptic Curve Fail project recently worked on improving a component of a hypothetical quantum attack against elliptic-curve cryptography.

More than 100 participants reportedly worked alongside AI coding agents, producing improvements that reduced estimates for an important quantum-circuit component by more than 50% compared with an earlier benchmark.

That does not mean the total computing power needed to attack Bitcoin has suddenly been cut in half.

It means researchers found a substantial improvement in one component of the proposed attack.

But that’s still meaningful.

It demonstrates that the algorithms themselves can improve, not just the hardware.

And AI can help accelerate that process.

Here’s the distinction I think people need to understand.

Quantum computing: We already know a mathematical algorithm that could threaten elliptic-curve cryptography. It’s called Shor’s algorithm.

The problem is that we don’t yet have a sufficiently powerful, fault-tolerant quantum computer to execute that attack against the cryptographic keys used by Bitcoin and Ethereum.

We know the general mathematical approach.

We don’t have the necessary machine.

Artificial intelligence: We already have powerful computers capable of running advanced AI models.

What we don’t know is whether an efficient classical algorithm exists that could make recovering private keys practical.

AI might help researchers discover one.

Or it might never find one because no such useful shortcut exists.

That’s the difference.

With quantum computing, we know the algorithm and are waiting for sufficiently capable hardware.

With AI-assisted classical cryptanalysis, we have the hardware and are asking whether a radically better algorithm can be discovered.

And both possibilities deserve attention.

Why Some Bitcoin Wallets Could Be More Exposed Than Others

Let’s talk about what this could mean for people actually holding Bitcoin.

An attacker attempting to recover a private key through a hypothetical elliptic-curve attack would generally need access to the corresponding public key.

Depending on the address type and how a wallet has been used, Bitcoin can sometimes keep that public key hidden until coins are spent.

Once certain transactions reveal the public key, that information becomes available on the blockchain.

Ethereum has a similar distinction.

An ordinary Ethereum account that has never signed a transaction generally has not directly revealed its full public key onchain.

Once it begins signing transactions, the public key can be reconstructed from the signatures.

And that creates an interesting security consideration.

Justin Drake has suggested that large, sophisticated holders consider what he calls “bunker mode.”

The general idea is to minimize unnecessary public-key exposure and consider using fresh addresses whose relevant public keys haven’t previously been revealed.

Now, that isn’t a universal solution.

It doesn’t eliminate every possible cryptographic vulnerability.

And not every Bitcoin address format has the same exposure characteristics.

But it’s an example of how wallet design and operational security could matter if future attacks become more capable.

Vitalik Buterin has also taken a measured position.

He agrees that AI-accelerated mathematical research deserves serious consideration, but he has warned against people panicking and frantically moving their cryptocurrency.

And I agree with that.

Because moving cryptocurrency introduces risks of its own.

Anybody who has sent a substantial amount of Bitcoin knows exactly what I’m talking about.

You copy the address.

You double-check it.

Maybe you send a small test transaction first.

Then you send the larger amount.

And you sit there waiting for confirmation.

That moment between pressing send and seeing the transaction arrive is stressful as hell.

It doesn’t matter whether you’re sending $1,000, $10,000 or $10 million.

If you make a mistake, you may never get that money back.

So I’m not suggesting everybody immediately start moving their funds because of a hypothetical AI threat.

I’m saying the industry needs to take the research seriously and prepare appropriate solutions.

What Happens If Elliptic-Curve Cryptography Actually Breaks?

Bitcoin could theoretically migrate to a different signature system.

Ethereum could do the same.

But think about what that would involve.

Protocol changes.

Wallet software updates.

Hardware-wallet upgrades.

Exchange migrations.

Custodian migrations.

Users moving funds.

And potentially enormous amounts of cryptocurrency needing to be transferred into new security arrangements.

Then there are dormant wallets.

Lost Bitcoin.

Abandoned accounts.

People who haven’t touched their coins in ten years.

And, of course, Satoshi’s Bitcoin.

What happens to assets controlled by keys that might eventually become vulnerable but whose owners cannot or will not migrate them?

That’s a complicated problem.

It would require serious technical decisions, coordination and potentially contentious debates about how different blockchain networks should respond.

Which is another reason to think about these issues before there’s an emergency.

The Biggest AI Security Threat Might Still Be You

Here’s something else.

AI doesn’t actually need to break elliptic-curve cryptography to steal cryptocurrency.

It could become extremely good at finding software vulnerabilities.

Smart-contract bugs.

Wallet implementation errors.

Exchange security weaknesses.

Problems in applications that interact with blockchains.

Or vulnerabilities that have existed for years without anybody noticing.

And then there’s what I think might be the biggest weakness of all.

Human beings.

I’ve been spending a lot of time experimenting with AI-generated images and videos.

Over the weekend, I went down another rabbit hole looking at AI filmmaking tools, including Higgsfield.

The technology is getting unbelievably good.

We’re talking about AI-generated characters, voices, music, visual effects and entire cinematic sequences.

Some of this stuff is amazing.

But think about what that means for fraud.

Imagine receiving a video call that looks and sounds exactly like somebody you know.

Your mother.

Your brother.

Your spouse.

Your boss.

Imagine getting an email that perfectly imitates the writing style of somebody you trust.

Or a text message that seems completely authentic because the AI knows enough about your relationships and communication habits to make it convincing.

You don’t need to crack a Bitcoin private key if you can convince the owner to give you access.

You don’t need to break a blockchain if you can manipulate somebody into signing a malicious transaction.

And AI could make those attacks much more sophisticated.

That’s social engineering.

And we’ve been dealing with it for decades.

AI just gives attackers a much more powerful set of tools.

That’s why I think the conversation about AI and cryptocurrency security needs to go beyond whether a particular mathematical algorithm is vulnerable.

We have to consider the entire security environment.

The cryptography.

The software.

The wallets.

The exchanges.

And the people using them.

Because ultimately, the weakest point in the system might not be the mathematics.

It might be us.

Crypto Prices

All right, that was a lot.

This was supposed to be a relatively short podcast, and somehow I’ve spent almost half an hour talking about elliptic curves, quantum computers and AI potentially taking over the world.

Let’s get into prices.

Bitcoin is sitting around $83,350, up approximately 0.5% over 24 hours.

Ethereum is around $2,150, up approximately 2%.

USDT remains number three.

BNB is trading around $749, up approximately 0.3%.

XRP is approximately $1.40, up around 0.9%.

USDC remains number six.

Solana is around $111, up approximately 1.8%.

TRON is sitting around $0.331, up approximately 0.3%.

Zcash is around $1,300, up approximately 6%.

Hyperliquid is approximately $86.22, up around 1.4%.

Litecoin is around $64.82, up approximately 2.2%.

Total Crypto Market Cap: approximately $2.83 trillion, up around 0.9%.

Fear & Greed Index: 57, Neutral.

My Take

I started last week thinking the discussion about AI breaking cryptography was mostly another round of speculation.

And I was wrong to dismiss it that quickly.

After listening to the All-In Podcast and digging further into the mathematics, I think this deserves a much more serious conversation.

Not because Bitcoin has been broken.

It hasn’t.

Not because AI has suddenly discovered how to recover private keys.

There’s no demonstrated evidence of that.

But because the entire security model depends on mathematical assumptions that researchers have spent decades studying.

And now we’re developing AI systems that can potentially accelerate mathematical research at an extraordinary rate.

That’s worth paying attention to.

I think the most important distinction is that AI doesn’t need to become infinitely powerful at brute-force computation.

It needs to discover better mathematics.

And if it does, the implications could extend far beyond Bitcoin.

We’re talking about modern digital infrastructure.

Banking.

Communications.

Government systems.

And enormous amounts of value protected by cryptographic keys.

The worst-case scenario is frightening, but it also isn’t inevitable.

Maybe AI never discovers a practical shortcut.

Maybe the research leads to better cryptography instead.

Maybe the industry uses these advances to strengthen security long before any serious threat emerges.

That’s what I hope happens.

And I think it’s why we should be encouraging this research rather than dismissing it as FUD.

There’s also a bigger conversation about who controls these increasingly powerful AI systems.

I find it fascinating that we’re developing technologies capable of performing advanced mathematical research while most people have very little visibility into what the most capable internal models can actually do.

I don’t know whether artificial superintelligence already exists somewhere behind closed doors.

I suspect the frontier of AI research is much further ahead than most people realize, but that’s my speculation.

What I do know is that the capabilities we’re seeing publicly are already extraordinary.

And we need to start thinking seriously about what happens when those capabilities affect critical infrastructure.

As for Bitcoin’s price, we’re still around $83K.

We held $80K last week, but I still think another test is possible.

We need to reclaim $87K and eventually start using the mid-$80,000 range as support before I’m going to get particularly excited about another run toward $90K.

For now, I’m watching the price, watching the AI research and trying to get a better understanding of where all this technology is going.

And I’m also going to try to get some sleep tonight.

This was supposed to be a short show.

It was not.

I’m still waiting for Craig Cobb to send over his market update, so you may get another Daily Crypto News episode this afternoon.

Have a great Monday.

Happy HODLing

Hey folks, I was out of sorts this weekend because I attended my first PSU White Out game. The tailgating was amazing and we spent all day in Happy Valley. Walked downtown and to the creamery before going back to visit several tailgating parties and then in for the big game. The energy was electric even though the overall mood was down since they are not ranked.

This was the beginning of the game and it eventually filled out and hit a record 114,000+. Welcome to my new Sunday series, hope you enjoy it.

🗺️ Where We Stand

Valley floor: ~$58,000 (June 2026 — the cycle bottom, confirmed)
You are here: ~$83,000 · +43% off the floor · this week: −2%
The summit: $126,198 (Oct 2025 ATH — 34% overhead)

🪜 The Ladder Overhead

🔹 $84–85K — 2026 buyers’ cost basis (supply wall) · +2% · next foothold
🔹 $87,570 — yearly open → green on the year · +5%
🔹 $100,000 — Std Chartered’s year-end target · +20%
🔹 $126,198 — the old summit · +52%

Clear $84–85K, where this year’s buyers are underwater, and trapped supply flips to fuel.

🧭 The Guides — This Week’s Report Card

This week’s $1B flush graded the voices in real time. How they’re aging:

✅ Called it — Peter Brandt flagged an early-October pullback weeks ahead (Sep 29); it landed on schedule. Eric Crown tagged September a “nothing month, then October moves” — read the rhythm right.

⏳ Holding firm — Standard Chartered reaffirmed $100K year-end through the flush (Oct 9); bold, unbroken, clock ticking. Matt Hougan’s “10-year grind up, not a moonshot” keeps fitting the chop better than the euphoric calls.

🔻 Looking early — Citi raised its target to $113K on Oct 2, days before the flush — right on the horizon, poorly timed for the week.

The read: nobody turned bearish — the real split is direction vs. timing, and this week timing won. Weight the guides who respect the path, not just the summit. Six weeks in, Brandt’s earned trust on timing, Hougan on framing, Saylor on simply doing what he says (he bought the dip again).

The Bottom Line

One week onto the climb, Bitcoin stumbled to $80,365 — and caught the ledge, whales adding ~15,000 BTC into the dip. A foothold, not a fall. Next is clearing $84–85K; CPI Wednesday is the weather. Base camp holds. We climb.

— The Inspirator ⚓

“In the middle of difficulty lies opportunity.”
— Albert Einstein

🎵 Song of the Day: “Won’t Back Down” — Tom Petty — spare, defiant, standing your ground.

📡 THE NEWS

📊 Market Snapshot

(Live · Friday Evening · CoinDesk + KuCoin + CryptoTicker)

🟧 BTC: $82,500 (+~1% · up ~3% off Thursday’s $80,365 low) 🟢
🔵 ETH: $2,490 (stabilizing after the 6× liquidation hit)
🌐 XRP: $1.42 (XRP ETFs the week’s lone inflow)
🟣 SOL: $116 (steadying)

The Hold: $80,365 held as the week’s low; BTC reclaimed $82K+ as Brent slipped to ~$103 and the war scare eased
The Conviction Call: Standard Chartered reaffirmed its $100,000 year-end target despite $729M of October ETF outflows — needs ~20% in 12 weeks
The Week: BTC ~−4% on the 7-day after a ~$1B+ liquidation flush; Fear & Greed cooled to 59
The Context: Q3 ran +43% ($58,566 → $83,576) — this week’s dip is a pullback within a strong quarter’s gains

Support: $80,365 (week low) → $80,000 (the line) → $78,000
Resistance: $83,398 (today’s high) → $84,432 → $87,000

⚓ Three Bitcoin Stories That Defined Today

🎯 STANDARD CHARTERED HELD $100K THROUGH THE FLUSH. Per KuCoin: after a week that saw ~$1B in liquidations and $729M of October ETF outflows (BlackRock and Fidelity hit hardest), Standard Chartered’s Geoff Kendrick reaffirmed the bank’s $100,000 year-end target — a call requiring ~20% upside in 12 weeks. The significance for a Career & Education evening isn’t the number; it’s the timing. Anyone can hold a bullish target in a green week. Kendrick restated his in the middle of the worst stretch of the quarter, because his thesis rests on fundamentals the dip didn’t touch. Conviction reaffirmed in the red is worth ten targets issued in the green.

🛢️ THE WAR SCARE EASED — AND BTC BOUNCED. Per CryptoTicker: Brent slipped back to ~$103 as the Iran-strike fears that drove the week faded, and Bitcoin recovered ~3% off its $80,365 low to reclaim $82K+. It’s the clean confirmation of the week’s read: the drop was outside weather — oil, war headlines, yields — and as the external pressure eased, the asset floated back up. Nothing about Bitcoin broke this week; the macro storm blew in and is now blowing out. The $80K line took the full force and held, which is the quiet structural win under a red week.

💸 THE HONEST PICTURE — $729M OUT, BUT Q3 WAS +43%. Per KuCoin: October’s ETF outflows ($729M) are real and worth respecting — near-term demand genuinely cooled. But zoom out: Q3 ran from $58,566 to $83,576, a ~43% gain, and this week’s pullback sits inside those gains, not below them. The flows ebb and flow; the quarter’s trend is intact. A down week after a +43% quarter is the market breathing, not the thesis breaking — exactly the frame the long-horizon voices (and today’s Standard Chartered call) keep pointing to.

🔑 Powered By OnRamp Bitcoin

Secured by three. Controlled by you.
A week of $1B liquidations and ETF outflows is a reminder that the long-horizon holders — the ones who hold through the red — don’t leave their stack exposed. OnRamp puts your Bitcoin in a 2-of-3 multisig vault across three independent regulated institutions: no single party can move it, no seed phrase to lose. Hold with conviction; secure with no single point of failure.
Get started: app.onrampbitcoin.com
Not financial advice. Just Bitcoin custody with no single point of failure. 🔑

🌅 THE FRIDAY THOUGHT — CAREER & EDUCATION (PM EDITION)

Conviction Is What You Hold In The Red

It’s easy to tell who believed in something when everything was going up. The real test came this week: a billion-dollar flush, four red days, money flowing out — and Standard Chartered reaffirmed its $100K target anyway. That’s the difference between an opinion and a conviction. An opinion is what you hold when it’s easy. A conviction is what you hold when it costs you something to keep holding it.

Every career tests this. You’ll declare a belief — in a strategy, a project, a direction, yourself — while conditions are favorable, and it feels like conviction. Then the hard stretch comes: the results dip, the doubters pile on, the evidence seems to turn against you. That’s the moment that reveals what you actually had. If the belief evaporates the instant it stops being rewarded, it was never conviction — it was just optimism riding a good trend. Real conviction is anchored to reasons, not to results, so it can hold through a stretch where the results temporarily contradict it. The professional checks: did my thesis actually break, or just my price? If only the price moved, you hold.

The green days tell you nothing about what you believe. The red days tell you everything. Hold the conviction that’s anchored to reasons; drop the opinion that was only riding the trend.

🎯 Opinion holds when it’s easy; conviction holds when it costs.
🔍 Anchor belief to reasons, not results — so it survives a bad stretch.
⚓ Ask: did my thesis break, or just my price?

Standard Chartered held $100K in the red. The red week is where you find out what you actually believe. ⚓

🎯 Your Move

One question: Which of your beliefs — about a plan, a path, yourself — is being tested by a “red stretch” right now, and is it anchored to reasons that still hold, or was it just optimism riding a good trend?

One challenge this weekend: Take the conviction currently under pressure and separate the two: has the thesis actually broken, or just the short-term results? If the reasons still stand, write them down and hold — deliberately, because it’s hard right now. Conviction you only keep when it’s easy was never conviction.

Stack sats. Stack self-awareness. Both compound.
— The Inspirator

WATCH THIS!

It’s your Daily Crypto News for Friday, October 9th, 2026. My name is Matt.

Go Guards!

The Cleveland Guardians won yesterday, and we’re heading to Game 5 of the ALDS.

But we’re not here to talk about baseball. We’re here to talk about Bitcoin, which just survived another major test of $80,000.

And when I say survived, I mean Bitcoin bounced.

I don’t necessarily mean it recovered.

There’s a difference.

We’ve been watching Bitcoin trade between roughly $82K and $87K for weeks. The goal was to break above $87K, move toward $89K to $90K, and eventually establish that higher range as support.

And when I talk about support and resistance, I’m not talking about some thin piece of paper sitting exactly at $90,000.

I think of it more like a sheet of ice covering water. You have to break through that entire resistance zone, which might run from $89K to $90K, and then establish that area as the new floor.

That’s what we wanted.

Instead, Bitcoin broke below $82K and tested $80K.

And that changes things.

I’m starting to think we’re entering a different trading range, potentially somewhere between $74K and $80K, unless Bitcoin can stage a more convincing recovery.

I don’t think we’re out of the woods.

And frankly, I wouldn’t be surprised if we see Bitcoin trading in the $70,000s relatively soon.

$1.2 Billion in Crypto Liquidations as Oil and Iran Drive the Market

The big story yesterday was the liquidation cascade.

Approximately $1.2 billion in leveraged crypto positions was liquidated over 24 hours, with more than $1 billion reportedly coming from long positions.

Here’s how some of that broke down:

• Ethereum: approximately $356 million in liquidations.

• Bitcoin: approximately $298 million.

• Solana: approximately $71 million.

• XRP: approximately $34 million.

Ethereum got absolutely slammed.

And this is what happens when too much leverage builds up in the system.

People are betting that Bitcoin and the broader crypto market will continue moving higher. Then something changes in the macro environment, prices start dropping, leveraged positions get liquidated, and those liquidations create even more selling pressure.

Suddenly, a relatively normal move becomes a much larger one.

Listener Obsidian Enoch wrote in with an observation that I think is pretty accurate.

He said this pullback feels more like macroeconomic pressure than anything specific to cryptocurrency. Leverage is getting flushed out, while oil prices, Treasury yields and the dollar are driving risk assets.

I agree with him.

Enoch, you’re getting a shout-out today.

Because that’s exactly what I’m watching.

The macroeconomic pressure chain looks something like this:

Iran escalation leads to higher oil prices, which increases inflation concerns, pushes Treasury yields higher, raises expectations for Federal Reserve tightening and puts pressure on Bitcoin and other risk assets.

That’s the problem.

Brent crude is still trading above $100 a barrel, although it fell more than 1% Friday morning.

The reported catalyst for Bitcoin’s rebound was President Trump’s comments suggesting the United States would not launch strikes against Iran before the midterm elections.

That’s how the rebound is being explained in the news.

But I have some serious questions about that.

First of all, why would military decisions be based on an election calendar?

If American personnel are being attacked and there’s a legitimate military objective, then what exactly are we waiting for?

Either there’s business to handle or there isn’t.

If there isn’t, then get out of there.

If there is, then make the decision based on the actual circumstances, not whether an election is coming up.

What worries me is the possibility that we’re simply delaying a much larger confrontation until after the midterms.

And if that happens, oil could become an even bigger problem.

I don’t know what’s going to happen.

But I do know that geopolitical uncertainty is having a substantial impact on financial markets right now.

Bitcoin’s New Support and Resistance Levels

The immediate question is whether $80K can become a reliable floor.

I’m not necessarily concerned about Bitcoin briefly trading at $79K or $79,500. I look at support as a range, not one exact number.

For me, the important area is approximately $79K to $81K.

If Bitcoin can stabilize there, then we need to start reclaiming the $83K to $84K area.

That would be the first sign that buyers are beginning to regain control.

But right now, I think we’re in a downtrend.

And if I were taking a bet, I’d be looking for Bitcoin to spend some time in the $70,000s.

Possibly lower, depending on what happens after the midterm elections.

The other problem is that institutional money has started moving out.

Bitcoin ETFs experienced another day of outflows Thursday, following nearly half a billion dollars in withdrawals Wednesday.

Together, that represents roughly three-quarters of a billion dollars leaving Bitcoin ETFs over two sessions.

That’s not encouraging.

And it makes a sustained recovery much more difficult when the broader macro environment is already working against us.

MARA Moves Bitcoin as Mining Companies Pivot Toward AI

Let’s get into some institutional and corporate news.

Bitcoin miner MARA transferred approximately $81 million worth of Bitcoin, nearly 1,000 BTC, to addresses associated with Galaxy Digital.

Now, that doesn’t necessarily mean MARA sold those coins.

Moving Bitcoin between wallets or transferring it to a financial services company is not confirmation of a sale.

But it is worth watching because MARA’s Bitcoin treasury has reportedly been shrinking.

The company held approximately 53,000 BTC in February, compared with around 35,000 by August.

And honestly, that’s part of the Bitcoin mining business.

Mining companies have enormous infrastructure costs.

They have machines.

They have electricity bills.

They have facilities.

They have employees.

And when Bitcoin’s price falls while mining difficulty remains high, their economics can deteriorate pretty quickly.

They’re still paying to operate all that equipment, but the Bitcoin they’re earning is worth less.

So what happens?

They sell some of their Bitcoin reserves to cover operating costs.

They shut down less efficient machines.

They reduce spending.

They try to survive until the market improves.

That’s the cycle.

And this is why the growing relationship between Bitcoin mining and artificial intelligence is so interesting.

Mining companies already have access to power infrastructure, data centers and computing facilities.

Some are now looking at ways to use that infrastructure for AI and high-performance computing.

The economics aren’t identical, and converting mining facilities into AI data centers isn’t necessarily simple or cheap.

But the opportunity is there.

Instead of depending almost entirely on Bitcoin mining profitability, these companies could potentially develop additional revenue streams from AI infrastructure.

And that could help smooth out some of the enormous volatility in the mining business.

Bitcoin mining has always been cyclical.

You make money during the good times, and then you spend the bad times trying not to bleed out.

If AI can help some of these companies generate revenue throughout the cycle, that’s a significant development.

Robinhood and T. Rowe Price Explore Tokenized ETFs

Robinhood is also exploring a tokenized version of an actively managed ETF with T. Rowe Price.

T. Rowe Price is one of the largest traditional asset managers in the world, with approximately $1.9 trillion in assets under management.

The proposed product would be represented as a stock token on Robinhood’s blockchain infrastructure.

This is another example of tokenization moving deeper into traditional finance.

We’ve already discussed tokenized Treasuries, public stocks, private-market exposure and cash-management funds.

Now we’re talking about actively managed investment products.

The bigger picture is that more traditional financial assets are being considered for blockchain-based issuance, ownership records and trading.

Thailand Approves Local Crypto ETFs as the UK Targets Sanctions Evasion

Thailand’s securities regulators have approved a framework allowing domestic asset managers to launch locally listed Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs.

The new rules are scheduled to take effect on October 16th.

That’s another market opening up regulated access to crypto investment products.

And I thought Thailand already had something like this, but apparently this is the new framework for locally listed products.

Meanwhile, the British government has imposed sanctions on three cryptocurrency exchanges and two payment-service centers accused of helping facilitate Russian sanctions evasion.

Two of the services reportedly handled transactions connected to the Kremlin-backed A7 financial network.

The sanctions reflect the continuing effort by Western governments to target financial infrastructure they believe is being used to move money around existing restrictions.

And that’s going to remain a major regulatory and enforcement issue for cryptocurrency, particularly as stablecoins and international payment networks become more widely used.

Vitalik Buterin Responds to the AI Cryptography Debate

Now let’s get back to one of the most interesting technology discussions we’ve had this week.

Yesterday, we talked about Ethereum researcher Justin Drake warning that advances in artificial intelligence and mathematics could eventually create new threats to the cryptography securing Bitcoin, Ethereum and other cryptocurrencies.

His argument wasn’t that these systems have already been broken.

They haven’t.

His concern was that improvements in AI-assisted mathematical research could justify preparing earlier than previously expected for potential vulnerabilities.

And now Vitalik Buterin has weighed in with a more measured position.

Essentially, don’t panic, but take the issue seriously.

And that’s exactly what I was saying yesterday.

Have the conversation.

Don’t dismiss the entire subject as FUD simply because somebody raised a concern about the security of existing cryptographic systems.

We’re talking about an enormous amount of money secured by these technologies.

Individuals.

Companies.

Institutions.

Governments.

If there is even a plausible risk that future advances in computing could threaten the cryptography protecting those assets, we should investigate it.

That doesn’t mean AI can currently recover Bitcoin private keys from public keys. There is no demonstrated capability to do that.

But it does mean researchers should continue evaluating the assumptions underlying these systems.

And I think there’s a larger discussion here about how people react to AI breakthroughs.

We’ve seen stories about AI systems helping solve difficult mathematical and scientific problems.

And whenever that happens, there’s often a debate about whether the AI deserves credit or whether the scientists whose work trained the system deserve the recognition.

Look, I understand the importance of acknowledging people’s contributions.

But if I learned mathematics from a teacher, who learned from another teacher, who learned from another teacher, and then I went out and solved a mathematical problem nobody had solved before, I would still be the one who solved it.

Of course, I might thank my teachers.

But the breakthrough still happened.

And that’s the part I think people are missing when it comes to AI.

The important thing is what these systems might allow us to accomplish.

We’re talking about potential breakthroughs in genetics, medicine, cancer research, longevity and other scientific fields.

Imagine what could happen if we put a serious, coordinated effort into using AI to solve some of those problems.

Instead, we spend an enormous amount of time arguing about whether AI should be allowed to do certain things, whether it received proper attribution and whether we should slow everything down.

I understand there are legitimate ethical concerns.

But I also think we’re overlooking the potential benefits.

Can we use these systems to help cure cancer?

Can we use them to accelerate scientific discoveries?

Can we figure out problems that have been sitting in front of humanity for generations?

That would be nice.

And no, before anybody takes me seriously, I don’t actually have evidence that Claude has secretly cured cancer and Anthropic is waiting until its IPO to announce it.

That’s a joke.

But it gets at my broader point.

AI is becoming an incredibly powerful tool.

Let’s use it.

And when it comes to cryptocurrency security, let’s make sure we’re taking advantage of those capabilities to strengthen our systems rather than pretending potential risks don’t exist.

Solana Targets Faster Blocks as XRP Ledger Expands Account Permissions

Solana is moving toward another performance improvement.

The network is completing a multistage upgrade intended to reduce its target block time from approximately 400 milliseconds to 200 milliseconds.

That’s essentially cutting the target time in half.

The final change is scheduled for approximately 3 p.m. UTC.

If successfully implemented, the improvement could help reduce the time between blocks and further improve the network’s responsiveness.

The XRP Ledger also activated an upgrade called Permission Delegation v1.1 on Thursday.

This is a particularly interesting development for institutional custody and financial operations.

The upgrade allows an account owner to authorize separate accounts to perform specific functions without giving those accounts unrestricted control over the primary account’s private keys.

Think about how a normal company operates.

You don’t give every employee access to every bank account.

You don’t give everybody the ability to move every dollar the company owns.

You have different permission levels.

Some employees can initiate payments.

Others can approve them.

Some can access records.

Others can manage compliance.

The same basic concept applies here.

A company using the XRP Ledger could potentially separate payment operations, compliance responsibilities and treasury control.

The primary account’s keys could remain secured while other authorized accounts perform limited functions.

And that makes sense.

I’ve talked about how blockchain infrastructure needs to accommodate the way institutions actually operate.

Banks and corporations don’t function by giving every employee unrestricted access to everything.

They use permissions.

They use controls.

They separate responsibilities.

And crypto infrastructure increasingly needs to support those same operational requirements.

That’s a legitimate problem being addressed.

Crypto Prices

Bitcoin is sitting around $83,000, up approximately 1% over 24 hours, but down roughly 4.2% over seven days.

Ethereum is having a rough week, trading around $2,496, down nearly 10% over seven days.

USDT remains number three.

BNB is around $741, down approximately 2.5%.

XRP is sitting around $1.38, essentially flat over the past 24 hours.

USDC remains number six.

Solana is around $110, down approximately 2.1%.

TRON is approximately $0.332, down around 0.6%.

Hyperliquid is trading around $85.63, up approximately 0.5%.

Zcash is around $1,223, up approximately 1.8% over 24 hours, but still down around 11% for the week.

And that weekly performance is really the story.

Bitcoin is down more than 4%.

Ethereum is down nearly 10%.

Uniswap is down approximately 18%.

The CoinMarketCap 20 Index is down around 5.5%.

A lot of the altcoin market is showing double-digit weekly losses.

We’re having a rough week.

And I don’t necessarily think it’s over.

My Take

I think we’re entering a more difficult period for Bitcoin.

Yesterday’s move back above $80K was encouraging, but I’m calling it a bounce, not a recovery.

We lost the $82K to $83K support area that had held for weeks.

We saw approximately $1.2 billion in liquidations.

ETF investors have been pulling money out.

Oil remains above $100.

And geopolitical uncertainty is creating a lot of additional pressure.

That’s not an environment where I’m particularly confident we’re about to break through $90K.

I think we could see Bitcoin around $74K to $75K as we approach the midterm elections.

And depending on the election results and what happens geopolitically afterward, I wouldn’t rule out lower prices.

Now, here’s where I think politics could become a significant factor.

My prediction is that Democrats win the House but not the Senate.

And I think the market will be able to digest that outcome.

But if Democrats win both chambers, I think there’s a possibility that crypto markets react negatively.

Not necessarily because Democrats are inherently bad for crypto.

It’s because I expect congressional investigations and political pressure surrounding President Trump, World Liberty Financial and the administration’s relationship with the cryptocurrency industry.

I think Democrats would focus heavily on Trump and his crypto-related businesses.

And in the process, there’s a possibility that broader crypto legislation, regulation and companies become caught up in those political fights.

That’s what concerns me.

Even if the primary target is Trump, the collateral damage could extend to the rest of the industry.

If markets begin pricing in that possibility ahead of the election, I could see additional selling pressure.

And in a particularly negative scenario, I wouldn’t rule out Bitcoin moving into the $60,000s or even $50,000s.

That’s not my base-case forecast. It’s a risk scenario based on how I think the political and regulatory environment could develop.

On the other hand, if Republicans retain control of both chambers, I think markets could respond more positively because the immediate risk of congressional confrontation over the administration’s crypto policies would be reduced.

That doesn’t mean Bitcoin automatically goes up.

We’d still have oil.

We’d still have Iran.

We’d still have Treasury yields, inflation and Federal Reserve policy.

Those factors don’t disappear because one party wins an election.

But I think the market would have one less major political uncertainty to price in.

Again, my prediction is Democrats take the House but not the Senate.

We’ll see what happens.

For now, I’m watching $80K as the immediate support zone and $83K to $84K as the first area Bitcoin needs to reclaim.

If that doesn’t happen, I think we need to start taking the possibility of another leg lower much more seriously.

Have a great Friday.

Happy HODLing