Good morning everybody.
It’s your Daily Crypto News for Thursday, September 24th, 2026.
Number go down.
The $85,000 level didn’t hold. Bitcoin is back in the low-to-mid $83,000s, and now we’re heading toward the level we’ve been talking about since the breakout:
Will $82,000 hold?
A few days ago I said something about this rally didn’t quite feel right. Almost everything suddenly looked positive at the same time. Oil was falling. Treasury yields dropped below 5%. Bitcoin ETFs were bringing in money. Shorts were getting obliterated.
Now some of those macro conditions are reversing.
Bitcoin’s $82K Test Is Coming as the Macro Picture Gets Harder
The first problem is yields.
The 10-year Treasury yield is back around 5.1%, while the 20-year is approaching 5.5%.
Then we got another strong economic number. S&P Global’s U.S. Composite PMI climbed to 58.4, its strongest reading since July 2021.
That’s normally great news.
The economy is strong. Businesses are doing well.
Except we’re in one of those weird environments where good economic news can become bad market news.
If economic activity remains hot while inflation remains a concern, the Federal Reserve has less reason to stop tightening. Markets are now pricing additional rate increases through next year.
Meanwhile, oil is moving higher again.
That’s the combination Bitcoin doesn’t want.
Higher oil can mean more inflation pressure. More inflation pressure can mean a more aggressive Fed. A more aggressive Fed can mean higher Treasury yields. Higher Treasury yields increase the return investors can get without taking Bitcoin-level risk.
And that’s where we find out what Bitcoin actually is in this environment.
Does Bitcoin begin acting like the safe-haven asset its strongest advocates have spent years describing?
Or does it continue trading primarily as a risk asset that gets hit when liquidity tightens?
We’re going to find out.
ETF Buyers Are Cushioning the Drop
Here’s the part I actually like.
Even as Bitcoin pulled back, ETF demand remained positive.
U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs took in another $346.9 million Wednesday, extending the streak to five consecutive days and bringing cumulative inflows over that stretch to roughly $2.65 billion. BlackRock accounted for about $166 million and Fidelity approximately $143 million.
That matters.
A few weeks ago, one of our biggest problems was that Bitcoin didn’t have enough obvious incremental demand.
Now Bitcoin is selling off while ETF buyers are still putting money into the market.
So my bullish case is pretty simple.
$80K to $82K becomes the floor.
If Bitcoin briefly trades at $81,300 or something, I don’t care. That’s the same range.
The exact number isn’t magic.
What I want to see is buyers consistently stepping in around that former resistance area.
The cautious case is also pretty straightforward.
The 10-year stays above 5%.
Oil stays above $100.
The Fed signals several more rate increases.
ETF inflows eventually slow.
If all four happen simultaneously, then Bitcoin has a much harder macro environment to fight against.
Blockchain.com and the NYSE Want 24/7 Tokenized Stocks
Now we get to the part of crypto that continues moving forward regardless of whether Bitcoin is $83K or $87K.
Blockchain.com and the New York Stock Exchange have signed an agreement to explore giving Blockchain.com users access to tokenized versions of U.S. exchange-listed stocks and ETFs.
The proposed system would use the NYSE’s planned digital alternative trading system and would be subject to regulatory approval.
We’re talking 24/7 trading, fractional shares, stablecoin funding and immediate onchain settlement.
I love this.
And I’ve been asking the same question for a while:
Why exactly do markets still have to close?
Obviously there are reasons. Closing markets creates a natural cooling-off period. It gives market makers, institutions and everybody else time to reset.
But technologically?
We don’t need it.
Crypto has demonstrated that a financial market can operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
And now traditional finance increasingly wants the same infrastructure.
This isn’t some theoretical idea anymore.
Tokenized securities are moving toward actual U.S. market infrastructure.
The Stablecoin Strategy We Talked About Yesterday Is Already Getting More Interesting
Yesterday’s entire show started with the theory from Bravo’s Research about stablecoins becoming part of a much larger U.S. dollar and Treasury strategy.
Today we have another piece of that story.
The Trump administration is reportedly considering joint ventures with private companies to promote dollar-backed stablecoins internationally. Treasury, the State Department and the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation could potentially participate.
And the reported strategic objectives are almost exactly what we talked about yesterday:
Reinforce global dollar dominance and increase demand for U.S. Treasury securities.
USDT and USDC together represent almost 90% of a stablecoin market worth roughly $292 billion.
So yesterday’s discussion is already looking a little less theoretical.
But there’s another side to this.
The IMF and other international institutions have warned that widespread dollar-stablecoin adoption can create serious problems for emerging-market economies.
Think about what happens in a country with a weak currency.
You earn money.
You immediately convert it into USDC or USDT.
Your neighbor does the same thing.
Businesses start doing it.
Savings move out of the local currency.
That creates additional demand for dollars and potentially Treasury reserves backing those stablecoins, but it can also accelerate capital flight and further weaken the domestic currency.
That’s not an accidental side effect of dollarization. It’s one of the central economic tensions created by widespread dollar stablecoin adoption.
So yes, this could be extremely powerful for the United States.
That doesn’t necessarily mean it’s good for everybody else.
The U.S.-China Competition Is Bigger Than Tariffs
President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping are meeting against a backdrop of disputes involving trade, rare earths, technology and artificial intelligence.
For crypto, the immediate connection is macroeconomic.
A serious deterioration in U.S.-China trade relations could add tariff-related inflation pressure, push yields higher and create a more difficult liquidity environment for Bitcoin.
But my view is that the larger competition is more interesting.
China wants greater influence over international financial infrastructure.
The United States wants to preserve dollar dominance.
China is developing its own digital financial systems.
The United States is increasingly embracing dollar stablecoins.
That’s not just a trade competition.
It’s a competition over which currency and financial infrastructure the rest of the world uses.
I don’t think that automatically means military conflict. The United States and China remain deeply economically interconnected.
They’re going to posture. They’re going to compete over trade, technology, AI, currency and geopolitical influence. But they also need each other economically.
And from Bitcoin’s perspective, what matters today is much simpler: if U.S.-China tensions contribute to higher inflation expectations and higher yields, that creates another macro headwind.
Bitcoin’s Quantum Problem Is Back, but AI Just Made One Potential Defense Cheaper
This is probably today’s most interesting technology and security story.
The basic quantum problem hasn’t changed.
Bitcoin relies on public-key cryptography. A sufficiently capable quantum computer could theoretically derive a private key from an exposed public key.
There is no known quantum computer capable of doing that to Bitcoin today.
That’s important.
This is a future security problem, not somebody sitting in a basement right now cracking Bitcoin wallets.
But researchers are already working on defenses.
StarkWare recently demonstrated a method using hash-based protection that could allow certain Bitcoin holders to move funds in a way designed to resist a future quantum attack without requiring a Bitcoin protocol upgrade.
Originally, the estimated computational cost of preparing one of these transactions was about $320.
Then StarkWare opened the code to a competition.
Participants using AI-assisted coding increased the search rate from roughly 146 million candidates per second to 881 million.
The estimated computational cost fell from approximately $320 to $66.
That’s about five times cheaper.
There’s an important limitation.
The new $66 estimate has not yet been demonstrated in another transaction actually mined on Bitcoin, and the method cannot save coins whose public keys have already been exposed once a sufficiently capable quantum attacker exists.
But I find the broader story fascinating.
We’re using AI to optimize defenses against a future quantum-computing threat to Bitcoin.
AI.
Quantum computing.
Bitcoin.
All in one story.
Welcome to 2026.
And I’ve said this before: if we reach the point where quantum computers can casually break modern public-key cryptography, Bitcoin isn’t going to be the only thing you should be worried about.
Banking, government systems, communications, identity systems and enormous portions of the internet depend on cryptography too.
Coinbase Scammer Gets Four to 12 Years
A 23-year-old Brooklyn man has been sentenced to four to 12 years in prison after stealing nearly $16 million from about 100 Coinbase users.
This wasn’t some brilliant blockchain exploit.
It was social engineering.
He impersonated Coinbase representatives, told victims their accounts were at risk and convinced them to transfer their assets to supposedly safe wallets.
The wallets were actually under his control.
Some individual victims lost more than $1 million.
Investigators ultimately connected him to the scheme using transaction records, blockchain analysis, digital forensics and evidence obtained through search warrants.
And here’s the part that makes the story even more ridiculous.
According to prosecutors, he sent substantial amounts of stolen cryptocurrency to gambling services. Messages recovered by investigators indicated that he believed he’d lost approximately $6 million gambling.
So no, we can’t say the victims simply got all their money back.
But this case demonstrates something we’ve talked about repeatedly.
Blockchain doesn’t eliminate crime.
It can, however, leave one hell of a financial trail.
Litecoin Is Doing Its Own Thing
While most of the crypto market is red, Litecoin is up roughly 8%.
Litecoin futures open interest climbed to around 8.96 million LTC, its highest level since January, as traders begin positioning well ahead of Litecoin’s next block-reward halving, expected next year.
We’ve seen this before with Litecoin.
People start positioning around the halving narrative.
Whether that turns into a sustained independent Litecoin rally is another question.
Historically, Litecoin still tends to live inside the larger Bitcoin-driven crypto cycle.
But on an otherwise ugly day, it’s one of the few major green names on the board.
Crypto Prices
Bitcoin is sitting around $83,563, down approximately 2.3% over 24 hours.
Ethereum is around $2,650, down approximately 2.8%.
BNB is approximately $770, down 1.1%.
XRP is around $1.47, down almost 6%.
Solana is approximately $113, down 2.9%.
TRON is around $0.339.
Zcash finally took a haircut after its enormous run, falling approximately 9.3% to $1,482.
Hyperliquid is around $91.65, down approximately 3.7%.
Pretty much red across the board.
Total Crypto Market Cap: approximately $2.84 trillion, down 2.4%.
Fear & Greed: 72, Greed.
My Take
This is the test I’ve been waiting for.
Getting Bitcoin above $85K was fun.
Watching it hit $87K was fun.
But the breakout was never going to be proven by the move up.
It’s going to be proven by the pullback.
We spent weeks staring at roughly $80K to $82K as resistance.
Now we’re approaching it from above.
If buyers show up around there and ETF inflows continue, then former resistance has become support. That’s exactly what you want after a breakout.
The problem is that the macro environment isn’t helping us anymore.
The 10-year is back above 5%.
Oil is moving higher.
The economy is still showing considerable strength.
And markets are increasingly contemplating additional Fed tightening.
That’s a very different setup from the one Bitcoin had when yields and oil were both falling.
Yet Bitcoin is still above $83K and ETF buyers are still putting hundreds of millions of dollars into the market.
That’s encouraging.
The other thing I’m watching is the infrastructure story.
Yesterday we talked about the possibility that stablecoins become part of a larger U.S. strategy for supporting dollar dominance and Treasury demand.
Today we’re hearing that the administration is actually considering promoting dollar stablecoins internationally.
Blockchain.com and the NYSE are exploring 24/7 tokenized equities.
The CFTC is talking openly about preparing markets for mass tokenization, onchain finance and round-the-clock trading.
Those aren’t meme-coin stories.
That’s financial infrastructure.
So I’m watching two completely different things at once.
Short term: Does $80K to $82K hold?
Long term: How much of the existing financial system eventually moves onto these rails?
We’ll get the answer to the first question pretty quickly.
The second one is going to take years.
Follow us at dailycryptonews.net and subscribe to the newsletter if you want the morning news in your inbox, the nightly roundup, Craig Cobb on Mondays, The Factory and the rest of what we’re doing.
And yes, the newsletter is built from this transcript with AI.
I’m not sitting down and typing this entire thing every morning.
It’s still me, baby.